Jump to content

Talk:Peter Atkins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"May you rot in hell"

[edit]

The occasion was one of a series of two debates filmed at Oxford in the summer of 1993 and broadcast later that year or possibly the following year. The series was entitled "God: For and Against" and was broadcast by Channel 4 (U.K.).

I know that Atkins' words were included in the broadcast because I came across a recording of the debates yesterday (I'd been in the audience and kept a copy). Atkins' exact words were "May you rot in hell, Professor Swinburne, may you rot in hell". Swinburne's remarks weren't addressed to Atkins, hence Atkins wasn't "replying" to him.

For the record, Richard Dawkins didn't take part in the debate in question (on the problem of evil). He was involved in the other debate in the series (on science and religion). Atkins was involved in both, as was Swinburne.

H Remster (talk) 20:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Peter Atkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Peter Atkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peter Atkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Out of nothing"

[edit]

This guy, even though he's not a mathematician, when debating John Lennox said, that he believes he can "create integers from the null set", meaning "out of nothing". It's a complete joke, and should be included. Video evidence here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZS5s-oVNsRo at around 44:00 mins. Extremely notable, and perhaps what this guy is most notable for. If you can create even the number 1 from 0 - you have just made news Peter Atkins! 2001:8003:6A23:2C00:2D88:2441:2998:18FF (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to know a huge amount of Maths to be a proffesor of Physical Chemistry so I wouldn't dismiss his opinions so quickly Ad hominem. DGtal (talk) 05:51, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think Atkins is just referring to the standard set theory construction of the natural numbers, and thus integers. This is not a joke. Imaginatorium (talk) 10:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If I recall correctly, John von Neumann also thought that integers can be created from the null set. But perhaps, like the Scotsman wearing pants under his kilt, von Neumann was not a 'true' mathematician.2A00:23C8:7907:4B01:6C7F:7F5F:AB13:76B4 (talk) 18:42, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]