User talk:Jor

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hλlf-Life listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hλlf-Life. Since you had some involvement with the Hλlf-Life redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fíriel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fíriel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fíriel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 02:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Fall of Gondolin

Hi, I'm Edaham. Jor, thanks for creating Fall of Gondolin!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I looked at the images used on this page and can not find any licence info. These images will be removed if licence info is not provided. You can check the tags by clicking the images for more info. Edaham (talk) 00:44, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nomination of High elves for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article High elves is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High elves until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:39, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fëa and hröa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fëa and hröa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fëa and hröa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Joshualouie711^talk 23:10, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of kings of Arnor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of kings of Arnor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of kings of Arnor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — TAnthony^Talk 18:09, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paths of the Dead for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paths of the Dead is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paths of the Dead until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:50, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fords of Isen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fords of Isen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fords of Isen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hallas (Steward)

The article Hallas (Steward) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this fictional character passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thain (Middle-earth)

The article Thain (Middle-earth) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this fictional title (office, position) passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thain (Middle-earth) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thain (Middle-earth) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thain (Middle-earth) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:07, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Finduilas of Dol Amroth

The article Finduilas of Dol Amroth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Took clan

The article Took clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this fictional entity passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:09, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bëor

The article Bëor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this fictional character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Finduilas of Dol Amroth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Finduilas of Dol Amroth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finduilas of Dol Amroth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Finduilas

The article Finduilas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this very minor supporting character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carcharoth

The article Carcharoth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG/WP:PLOT. Non-notable fictional character (animal).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Caras Galadhon

The article Caras Galadhon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this fictional location passes WP:GNG/NFICTION. Pure PLOT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Caras Galadhon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caras Galadhon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caras Galadhon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tilion

The article Tilion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails WP:PLOT, WP:GNG, WP:NFICTION. BEFORE shows nothing that's not in passing or a plot summary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:42, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brandybuck Clan

The article Brandybuck Clan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Ficitonal family (tree), fails WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tilion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tilion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tilion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 05:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rhûn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rhûn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhûn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:53, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arvedui for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arvedui is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arvedui until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dagor Aglareb

The article Dagor Aglareb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Obscure fancruft. Little notability in the realms of Tolkien, no notability in real life

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm (talk) 22:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of First Battle of Beleriand

The article First Battle of Beleriand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Obscure battle in the LOTR backstory. Fails WP:GNG and is barely sourced with primary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm (talk) 22:09, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eluréd and Elurín for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eluréd and Elurín is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eluréd and Elurín until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:18, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dol Amroth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dol Amroth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dol Amroth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 00:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carcharoth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carcharoth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carcharoth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amandil

The article Amandil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character. Fails GNG. As the article says, this character is most notable for being the father of Elendil, and notability is not inherited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm (talk) 22:35, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beleg

The article Beleg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character. Only referenced in RS in passing. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm (talk) 05:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Huor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Huor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 03:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Éothéod for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Éothéod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Éothéod until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rhovanion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rhovanion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhovanion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 05:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Lond Daer Enedh" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lond Daer Enedh. Since you had some involvement with the Lond Daer Enedh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 03:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Gwathlo" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gwathlo. Since you had some involvement with the Gwathlo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 03:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Bralda-hîn" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bralda-hîn. Since you had some involvement with the Bralda-hîn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 06:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Agathurush" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Agathurush. Since you had some involvement with the Agathurush redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 05:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tyrn Gorthad" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tyrn Gorthad. Since you had some involvement with the Tyrn Gorthad redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 05:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Glithui" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Glithui. Since you had some involvement with the Glithui redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 06:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Nîn-in-Eilph" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nîn-in-Eilph. Since you had some involvement with the Nîn-in-Eilph redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 18:53, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Onodló" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Onodló. Since you had some involvement with the Onodló redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 18:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Limlight" and "Limlîht" listed at Redirects for discussion

I've listed Limlight and Limlîht at RfD. Since the Middle-earth rivers list no longer exists, these article redirect to a page where they aren't discussed. Since you created the redirects originally, you might want to participate in the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 02:33, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Emyn Uial" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Emyn Uial. Since you had some involvement with the Emyn Uial redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 02:37, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Denethor I" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Denethor I. Since you had some involvement with the Denethor I redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 18:31, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Gwathir" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gwathir. Since you had some involvement with the Gwathir redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 21:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rómendacil

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rómendacil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BenKuykendall (talk) 04:23, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Atanatar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Atanatar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hog Farm (talk) 04:29, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arathorn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arathorn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arathorn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 04:31, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Argeleb

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Argeleb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hog Farm (talk) 04:32, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arveleg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arveleg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hog Farm (talk) 04:33, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elendur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elendur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elendur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 04:40, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lalaith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lalaith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lalaith (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Lake Nenuial" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lake Nenuial. Since you had some involvement with the Lake Nenuial redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 04:40, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Malduin" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Malduin. Since you had some involvement with the Malduin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 04:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Sîr Ninglor" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sîr Ninglor. Since you had some involvement with the Sîr Ninglor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 04:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Ginglith" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ginglith. Since you had some involvement with the Ginglith redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 15:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"River Running" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect River Running. Since you had some involvement with the River Running redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 15:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Khîm" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Khîm. Since you had some involvement with the Khîm redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 20:36, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Umbar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Umbar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umbar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 19:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Gilrain" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gilrain. Since you had some involvement with the Gilrain redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 20:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Ringwil" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ringwil. Since you had some involvement with the Ringwil redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 20:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Hidden Way" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hidden Way. Since you had some involvement with the Hidden Way redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 02:43, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Langflood" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Langflood. Since you had some involvement with the Langflood redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 02:44, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Mindeb" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mindeb. Since you had some involvement with the Mindeb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 03:38, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Andunië" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Andunië. Since you had some involvement with the Andunië redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:15, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Carn Dûm" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Carn Dûm. Since you had some involvement with the Carn Dûm redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Amandil" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Amandil. Since you had some involvement with the Amandil redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 23:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Dan (Middle-earth)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dan (Middle-earth). Since you had some involvement with the Dan (Middle-earth) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 16:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Lefnui" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lefnui. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 2#Lefnui until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 23:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Five Rivers of Lebennin" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Five Rivers of Lebennin. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 2#Five Rivers of Lebennin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 23:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Loeg Ningloron" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Loeg Ningloron. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 16#Loeg Ningloron until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 02:46, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taliska for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taliska is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taliska until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 15:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Magic Isles" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Magic Isles. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 5#Magic Isles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 23:05, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Rhimdath" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Rhimdath. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 25#Rhimdath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 00:28, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Greyflood" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Greyflood. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 14#Greyflood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 23:47, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Gwathló" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Gwathló. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 14#Gwathló until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 23:50, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Swanfleet river" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Swanfleet river. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 15#Swanfleet river until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 02:20, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Sernui" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sernui. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 20#Sernui until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 23:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Ninglor" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ninglor. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 5#Ninglor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 22:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Great Gulf (Middle-earth)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Great Gulf (Middle-earth). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 21#Great Gulf (Middle-earth) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jontesta (talk) 18:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Eärnil" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Eärnil. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 14#Eärnil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hildeoc (talk) 11:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Glanduin" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Glanduin. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 22#Glanduin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 05:05, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Nandorin" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nandorin. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 25#Nandorin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hildeoc (talk) 17:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Thrall-Noldorin" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Thrall-Noldorin. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 20#Thrall-Noldorin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hildeoc (talk) 23:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Nibin-Noeg" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nibin-Noeg. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 10#Nibin-Noeg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 03:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Valimar" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Valimar and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 15#Valimar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 09:07, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Silverlode" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Silverlode has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 28 § Silverlode until a consensus is reached. Hildeoc (talk) 00:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Falathrim" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Falathrim has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 13 § Falathrim until a consensus is reached. Hildeoc (talk) 02:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]