Talk:Olaf Stapledon

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Olaf Stapledon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Philosophy: Philosophers Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

H.G. Wells and Olaf Stapledon==

Could someone elucidate the nature of the disagreement between the two? As it is, it seems to suggest H.G. Wells was opposed to both organized religion and religious yearnings, when (if I'm not mistaken) Wells was in fact a theist -- for part of his life, at least. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.98.117.119 (talk) 14:47, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

I've added the information that OS was a strong influence on Brian Aldiss, and slightly modified the contention that CS Lewis's Cosmic Trilogy was written "in response" to his work. Lewis was at least as concerned with repudiating the ideas of HG Wells and GB Shaw. - Phil Purser-Hallard

Stapledon worked with Quakers during the war and admired them. He also had spiritual interests that don't quite fit with his agnostic or deist views. That said he had no interest in religion, he was just more positive on Quakers then most. There is Robert Crossley's biography and other sources to confirm that.--T. Anthony 13:47, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis praises Stapledon in The Abolition of Man but elsewhere refers to Stapledon's conception of God (in Star Maker) as amounting to Satanism. I'll look for the references. Xanthoxyl 14:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis called it "devilish" or "diabolical", I have him saying so in my notes somewhere, but there's times when this seems to just be an expression he uses to mean "arrogant and bad." I read a collection of Lewis's letters and in the period when he thought religion was wishful-thinking nonsense he still called things he didn't like "devilish." That said the God in Star Maker is somewhat callous and that could seem like a form of dystheism which is sometimes seen as relational to Satanism.--T. Anthony 22:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's high time we had a picture here. - R.Gemmel

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:20, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stapledon maintained a long correspondence with Woolf

(Stapledon maintained a long correspondence with Woolf) appears in the name dropping section. Both direct to disambiguation pages. I'm ambiguated. MartinSFSA (talk) 04:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks not needed here; one links the last name of the subject, which would be circular; the other is linked earlier in the same sentence.

Thanks, Yworo! MartinSFSA (talk) 09:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olaf Stapledon signature.svg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Olaf Stapledon signature.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:33, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Olaf Stapledon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]