Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1605 in Terrorism
1605 in Terrorism was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE
As above. 67.160.75.230 01:05, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: This has got to go. Gunpowder Plot has a fair article, and so does Guy Fawkes. It's Anglocentric, has only the one item, and I don't think we should be anachronistically applying today's labels to 17th century events. If there were hopes of someone adding in all the Terrors, martyrdoms, etc. for the rest of the year, were willing to add in Spain, Italy, France, Holland, the New World tribes, Asia.... Being serious and stern about the article is not the same thing as bashing the contributor, I hope. Geogre 01:36, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- This is isolated in the whole scheme of the timeline and the world issues and such. I vote to delete this, too. Mike H 01:37, Jul 20, 2004 (UTC)
- The event is covered in the aforementioned articles and 1605. Delete. --Ardonik 03:53, Jul 20, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Contains no information not more readily available in other articles, and IMO never will. Not a good title. Andrewa 01:55, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. As above, so below...Fire Star 13:59, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- NO!!!!!!!!! DO NOT DELETE THIS ARTICLE!!!!!!!111 --Patricknoddy 22:15, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)Patricknoddy 18:24 July 22, 2004 (UTC)
- I would say redirect to List of terrorist incidents where this is listed. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 22:22, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - redundant. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:30, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.