Talk:The Party's Over: Oil, War, and the Fate of Industrial Societies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Vfd

On 19 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/The Party's Over: Oil, War, and the Fate of Industrial Societies for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 10:28, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)

Cleanup

Everything after "Detailed synopsis" should be deleted. It's unreadable (no proper sentences and paragraphs) and rather pointless since it mostly just gives the topics (in painful detail) without actually providing much of the book's ideas and conclusions. I've deleted this once before and the original author of the article has chosen to bring it back, so I'll pass on removing it again. --Lee Hunter 11:39, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

No, please (do not delete the body).

It is useful to know, which book writes about these.

If you search "food cycle" here on wiki, it is the one of only two articles, that can be found, and it would probably satisfy other similar searches...

(So rather try to provide this level of detail (ie. "important keyword list") for other interesting books also...)

(And please note, that the information you supply to encyclopedy, not only describes the topic, but also serves for search-hits from the reverse side, knowing topic keyword and not a title...)

May 5 2006, Semi.

No. That section is ultra-POV and is advertising for the book. Although a more detailed description may be needed, for this article to be cleaned up (see above comment) and be NPOV that section has to go (at least in it's current form). I will let someone else rewrite it if they can, but I will remove it. Polonium 20:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]