Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rasge (cat)
Appearance
Rasge (cat) was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE
Yet another Simpsons one-off. Delete. Indrian 05:51, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
Keep.If Dr Johnson's cat is in, Bart Simpson's cat is in. Hodge lowered the cruft bar and Rasge vaults it. Dr Zen 06:40, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)- You do realize that this is not actually the Simpsons' cat, right? Snowball II is the Simpsons feline companion. This particular cat is part of the premise of a single Simpsons show and is therefore just a one-shot gag, no different than several other Simpsons gags that have been dealt with recently in vfd. Indrian 06:52, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. Delete imaginary cats. Dr Zen 23:09, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- You do realize that this is not actually the Simpsons' cat, right? Snowball II is the Simpsons feline companion. This particular cat is part of the premise of a single Simpsons show and is therefore just a one-shot gag, no different than several other Simpsons gags that have been dealt with recently in vfd. Indrian 06:52, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Hodge: famous. Rasge: not famous. - Nunh-huh 06:58, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Hodge famous?! I don't think the guy on the omnibus would agree. Dr Zen 23:09, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Perhaps we're aiming a bit above the omnibus crowd, then. - Nunh-huh 03:55, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Perhaps you are.Dr Zen 05:46, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I am. - Nunh-huh 05:53, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Who exactly are you aiming at?Dr Zen 06:27, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Those who realize that some things are more important than others. - Nunh-huh 07:04, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- You think the "omnibus crowd" don't realise that? In turn, you do realise, don't you, that the guy on the omnibus might think different things from you are more important than others?Dr Zen 07:11, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Those who realize that some things are more important than others. - Nunh-huh 07:04, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Who exactly are you aiming at?Dr Zen 06:27, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I am. - Nunh-huh 05:53, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Perhaps you are.Dr Zen 05:46, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Perhaps we're aiming a bit above the omnibus crowd, then. - Nunh-huh 03:55, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Hodge famous?! I don't think the guy on the omnibus would agree. Dr Zen 23:09, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Actually, you're the one who thought the omnibus guy would think Rasge was famous. I give him more credit than you. - Nunh-huh 21:21, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC) [Indent removed]
- Nope. I said he wouldn't agree that Hodge was famous. Dr Zen 00:14, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- You're right. That's what you said. If either he or you think Hodge and Rasge are equivalent in fame, you're simply wrong. - Nunh-huh 00:32, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- If someone has heard of neither, each are exactly equivalent in fame. In any case, that wasn't what I said either. Hodge might have the edge in fame, but neither is famous.Dr Zen 00:36, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I'm glad that you agree that Hodge is more famed. - Nunh-huh 00:47, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- If I'm reading this right, it appears that two of you have gone to a thirteen-asterisk indent to express the vehemence of your agreement that this particular cat does meets neither the high bar for high-brow cat notability nor the high bar for low-brow cat notability, and ought to have its waveform collapsed. How in-felix-itious! Such cathexis! [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:16, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Its waveform will only collapse if Schrödinger counts the votes here....proving, I suppose, that he hasn't yet. <g> - Nunh-huh 01:25, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- If I'm reading this right, it appears that two of you have gone to a thirteen-asterisk indent to express the vehemence of your agreement that this particular cat does meets neither the high bar for high-brow cat notability nor the high bar for low-brow cat notability, and ought to have its waveform collapsed. How in-felix-itious! Such cathexis! [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:16, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I'm glad that you agree that Hodge is more famed. - Nunh-huh 00:47, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- If someone has heard of neither, each are exactly equivalent in fame. In any case, that wasn't what I said either. Hodge might have the edge in fame, but neither is famous.Dr Zen 00:36, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- You're right. That's what you said. If either he or you think Hodge and Rasge are equivalent in fame, you're simply wrong. - Nunh-huh 00:32, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Nope. I said he wouldn't agree that Hodge was famous. Dr Zen 00:14, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Merge with List of Simpson's cats or something. Kappa 07:27, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)Delete unless verified Kappa 00:10, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)- Delete. I'm not convinced this is real. No google hits, and I remember the episode it's supposed to be in. Online reviews of this episode have no mention of it either. Xezbeth 08:05, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Minor fancruft or hoax, either way it should go. --fvw* 08:25, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
- Delete: DCEdwards1966 20:25, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect with the episode. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 20:38, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Likely prank--zero hits for rasge snowball. What Xezbeth said. Niteowlneils 21:51, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, Simpsons cats don't qualify as viable feline cruft. Wyss 00:10, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, no merge or redirect: fancruft or prank. Wile E. Heresiarch 00:11, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. If necessary, merge with One-time characters from The Simpsons before deleting. utcursch 07:51, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Single episode character. - 81.70.91.207 10:01, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 17:30, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Merge with One-time characters from The Simpsons], like all the others. Alphax (talk) 04:50, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Imaginary cats are inherently notable.Merge as per Alphax. iMeowbot~Mw 03:43, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC) whoops.- Comment. Why are people supporting a merge? This cat doesn't exist. There have been five Snowballs in the Simpsons (I, II, III, Coltane, and V) and this isn't one of them. Xezbeth 09:28, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect. I've nothing against articles on one-time characters in general, but there are so many for the Simpsons that it makes a unified article on all of them more worthwhile. Bryan 21:04, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.