Jump to content

Hugh Everett III

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hugh Everett III
Hugh Everett in 1964
Born(1930-11-11)November 11, 1930
Washington, D.C., U.S.
DiedJuly 19, 1982(1982-07-19) (aged 51)
McLean, Virginia, U.S.
Alma materCatholic University of America
Princeton University (PhD)
Known forMany-worlds interpretation
Everett's theorem[1][2][3]
ChildrenElizabeth Everett, Mark Oliver Everett
Scientific career
FieldsPhysics
Operations research
Optimization
Game theory
InstitutionsInstitute for Defense Analyses
American Management Systems
Monowave Corporation
Doctoral advisorJohn Archibald Wheeler

Hugh Everett III (/ˈɛvərɪt/; November 11, 1930 – July 19, 1982) was an American physicist who, in his 1957 PhD thesis, proposed what is now known as the many-worlds interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics.

In danger of losing his draft deferment, Everett took a research job with the Pentagon the year before completing the oral exam for his PhD and did not continue research in theoretical physics after his graduation.[4] Afterward, he developed the use of generalized Lagrange multipliers for operations research and applied this commercially as a defense analyst and a consultant. He died at the age of 51 in 1982. He is the father of musician Mark Oliver Everett.

Although largely disregarded until near the end of Everett's lifetime, the MWI received more credibility with the discovery of quantum decoherence in the 1970s and has received increased attention in recent decades, becoming one of the mainstream interpretations of quantum mechanics alongside Copenhagen, pilot wave theories, and consistent histories.

Early life and education

[edit]

Hugh Everett III was born in 1930 and raised in the Washington, D.C. area. His parents separated when he was young. Initially raised by his mother (Katherine Lucille Everett, née Kennedy), he was raised by his father (Hugh Everett, Jr.) and stepmother (Sarah Everett, née Thrift) from the age of seven.[5]

At age 12, Everett wrote a letter to Albert Einstein asking him whether that which maintained the universe was something random or unifying.[6] Einstein responded as follows:

Dear Hugh: There is no such thing like an irresistible force and immovable body. But there seems to be a very stubborn boy who has forced his way victoriously through strange difficulties created by himself for this purpose. Sincerely yours, A. Einstein[6]

Everett won a half scholarship to St. John's College High School in Washington, D.C. From there, he moved to the nearby Catholic University of America to study chemical engineering as an undergraduate. There, he read about Dianetics in Astounding Science Fiction. Although he never exhibited interest in Scientology (which Dianetics became), he retained a distrust of conventional medicine throughout his life.[5]

During World War II, Everett's father was fighting in Europe as a lieutenant colonel on the general staff. After the war, Everett's father was stationed in West Germany, and Everett joined him in 1949, taking a year off from his undergraduate studies. Father and son were both keen photographers and took hundreds of pictures of West Germany being rebuilt. Reflecting their technical interests, the pictures were "almost devoid of people".[5]

Everett graduated from the Catholic University of America in 1953 with a degree in chemical engineering, although he had completed sufficient courses for a mathematics degree as well.

Princeton

[edit]

Everett received a National Science Foundation fellowship that allowed him to attend Princeton University for graduate studies. He started his studies at Princeton in the mathematics department, where he worked on the nascent field of game theory under Albert W. Tucker, but slowly drifted into physics. In 1953 he took his first physics courses, notably Introductory Quantum Mechanics with Robert Dicke.[5]

In 1954, Everett took Methods of Mathematical Physics with Eugene Wigner, although he remained active in mathematics and presented a paper on military game theory in December. He passed his general examinations in the spring of 1955, thereby gaining his master's degree, and then started work on his dissertation that would (much) later make him famous. He switched thesis advisor to John Archibald Wheeler sometime in 1955, wrote a couple of short papers on quantum theory, and completed his long paper "Wave Mechanics Without Probability" in April 1956.[7]

In his third year at Princeton, Everett moved into an apartment he shared with three friends he had made during his first year, Hale Trotter, Harvey Arnold[8] and Charles Misner. Arnold later described Everett as follows:

He was smart in a very broad way. I mean, to go from chemical engineering to mathematics to physics and spending most of the time buried in a science fiction book, I mean, this is talent.[5]

During this time, Everett met Nancy Gore, who typed up his paper "Wave Mechanics Without Probability". He married her the next year.[9][10] The paper was later retitled "The Theory of the Universal Wave Function".

Wheeler traveled to Copenhagen in May 1956 with the goal of getting a favorable reception for at least part of Everett's work, but in vain.[11][12] In June 1956 Everett started defense work in the Pentagon's Weapons Systems Evaluation Group (WSEG). Completing his PhD within a year of starting at WSEG was a job requirement, and in April 1957 he returned briefly to Princeton to defend his thesis. The oral examination took place on April 23. The principal examiners—Wheeler, Bargmann, H. W. Wyld, and Dicke—concluded: "The candidate passed a very good examination. He dealt with a very difficult subject and defended his conclusions firmly, clearly, and logically. He shows marked mathematical ability, keenness in logic analyses, and a high ability to express himself well."[10] With this Everett completed his PhD in physics from Princeton, his doctoral dissertation titled "On the foundations of quantum mechanics".[13]

A short article, which was a compromise between Everett and Wheeler about how to present the many-worlds concept and almost identical to the final version of his thesis, was published in Reviews of Modern Physics, accompanied by a favorable review by Wheeler.[14] Everett was not happy with the article's final form.[5]: 160 

Career

[edit]
Everett's attendance marked the transition from academia to commercial work.

On October 23–26, 1956, Everett attended a weapons orientation course managed by Sandia National Laboratories at Albuquerque, New Mexico, to learn about nuclear weapons, and became a fan of computer modeling while there. In 1957, he became director of the WSEG's Department of Physical and Mathematical Sciences. Much, but not all, of Everett's research at WSEG remains classified. He worked on various studies of the Minuteman missile project, which was then starting, as well as the influential study The Distribution and Effects of Fallout in Large Nuclear Weapon Campaigns.[15][16]

During March and April 1959, Everett visited Copenhagen at Wheeler's request in order to meet with Niels Bohr, the "father of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics". The visit was a complete disaster; Bohr "rejected Everett’s approach as a whole, defending the Copenhagen approach to measurement". The conceptual gulf between their positions was too wide to allow any meeting of minds; Léon Rosenfeld, one of Bohr's devotees, called Everett "undescribably stupid" and said he "could not understand the simplest things in quantum mechanics". Everett later described this experience as "hell...doomed from the beginning".[17][a]

While in Copenhagen, Everett started work on a new idea to use generalized Lagrange multipliers for mathematical optimization. His theorem, published in 1963, relates the Lagrangian bidual to the primal problem.[1]

In 1962 Everett accepted an invitation to present the relative-state formulation (as it was still called) at a conference on the foundations of quantum mechanics at Xavier University. In his exposition Everett presented his derivation of probability and also stated explicitly that observers in all branches of the wavefunction were equally "real." He also agreed with an observation by Boris Podolsky that "It looks like we would have a non-denumerable infinity of worlds".[17]

In August 1964, Everett and several WSEG colleagues started Lambda Corp. to apply military modeling solutions to various civilian problems. During the early 1970s, defense budgets were curtailed and most money went to operational duties in the Vietnam War, resulting in Lambda eventually being absorbed by the General Research Corp.

In 1973, Everett and Donald Reisler (a Lambda colleague and fellow physicist) left the firm to establish DBS Corporation in Arlington, Virginia. Although the firm conducted defense research (including work on United States Navy ship maintenance optimization and weapons applications), it primarily specialized in "analyzing the socioeconomic effects of government affirmative action programs" as a contractor under the auspices of the Department of Justice and the Department of Health, Education and Welfare.[18] For a while, the company was partially supported by American Management Systems, a business consulting firm that drew upon algorithms Everett developed. He concurrently held a non-administrative vice presidency at AMS and was frequently consulted by the firm's founders.

Everett cultivated an early aptitude for computer programming at IDA and favored the TRS-80 at DBS, where he primarily worked for the rest of his life.

Later recognition

[edit]

In 1970 Bryce DeWitt wrote an article for Physics Today on Everett's relative-state theory, which he dubbed many-worlds, which prompted a number of letters from physicists.[b] These letters, and DeWitt's responses to the technical objections they raised, were also published. Meanwhile DeWitt, who had corresponded with Everett on the many-worlds / relative state interpretation when it was published in 1957, started editing an anthology on the many-worlds interpretation. In addition to the original articles by Everett and Wheeler, the anthology was dominated by Everett's 1956 paper "The Theory of the Universal Wavefunction", which had never been published before. The book was published late in 1973 and sold out completely. In 1976 an article on Everett's work appeared in the science fiction magazine Analog.[17]

In 1977, Everett was invited to give a talk at a conference Wheeler had organized at Wheeler's new location at the University of Texas at Austin. As with the Copenhagen visit, Everett vacationed from his defense work and traveled with his family. Everett met DeWitt there for the first and only time. His talk was quite well received and influenced a number of physicists in the audience,[17] including Wheeler's graduate student David Deutsch, who later promoted the many-worlds interpretation to a wider audience.[17] Everett, who "never wavered in his belief in his many-worlds theory",[19] enjoyed the presentation; it was the first time in years he had talked about his quantum work in public. But he did little to promote his theory, he said "[I] had washed my hands of the whole affair in 1956".[17]: 24  Wheeler started the process of returning Everett to a physics career by establishing a new research institute in California, but nothing came of that proposal. In 1980, Wheeler said he thought the theory "creates too great a load of metaphysical baggage to carry along".[20][17][21]

Death and legacy

[edit]

At age 51, Everett died suddenly of a heart attack at home[9] in his bed on the night of July 18–19, 1982. His obesity, frequent chain-smoking and alcohol drinking[9] almost certainly contributed to this, although he seemed healthy at the time. A committed atheist,[5] he had asked that his remains be disposed of in the trash. His wife first kept his ashes in an urn, but after a few years she complied with his wishes.[5] Of Everett's death, his son, Mark Oliver Everett, later said:

I think about how angry I was that my dad didn't take better care of himself. How he never went to a doctor, let himself become grossly overweight, smoked three packs a day, drank like a fish and never exercised. But then I think about how his colleague mentioned that, days before dying, my dad had said he lived a good life and that he was satisfied. I realize that there is a certain value in my father's way of life. He ate, smoked and drank as he pleased, and one day he just suddenly and quickly died. Given some of the other choices I'd witnessed, it turns out that enjoying yourself and then dying quickly is not such a hard way to go.[9]: 235 

Of the companies Everett initiated, only Monowave Corporation still existed as of 2023, in Seattle.[22] It is managed by co-founder Elaine Tsiang, who received a PhD in physics under Bryce DeWitt at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill before working for DBS as a programmer.

Everett's daughter, Elizabeth, died by suicide in 1996,[23] and his wife died of cancer in 1998. Everett's son, Mark Oliver Everett, is also known as "E" and is the main singer and songwriter for the band Eels. The Eels album Electro-Shock Blues, written during the late 1990s, was inspired by E's emotional response to these deaths.

Mark Everett explored his father's work in the hour-long BBC television documentary Parallel Worlds, Parallel Lives.[24][25][26][27] The program was edited and shown on the Public Broadcasting Service's Nova series in the USA in 2008.[28][29][30] In the program, Mark says he was unaware of his father's status as a brilliant and influential physicist until his death.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Everett recounted his meeting with Bohr as "that was a hell... doomed from the beginning". Léon Rosenfeld, a close collaborator of Bohr, said "With regard to Everett neither I nor even Niels Bohr could have any patience with him, when he visited us in Copenhagen more than 12 years ago in order to sell the hopelessly wrong ideas he had been encouraged, most unwisely, by Wheeler to develop. He was undescribably[sic] stupid and could not understand the simplest things in quantum mechanics."[17]: 113 
  2. ^ The term "many-worlds" was coined by Bryce DeWitt, but David Deutsch, having met Everett for dinner in 1977, says that Everett was actually excited by the term and defended it. "Relative state" was Wheeler's terminology – Everett's own original choice was "correlation interpretation" .[6][17]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Lemaréchal (2001, pp. 125–126): Lemaréchal, Claude (2001). "Lagrangian relaxation". In Michael Jünger and Denis Naddef (ed.). Computational combinatorial optimization: Papers from the Spring School held in Schloß Dagstuhl, May 15–19, 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 2241. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 112–156. doi:10.1007/3-540-45586-8_4. ISBN 978-3-540-42877-0. MR 1900016. S2CID 9048698.
  2. ^ Everett (1963)
  3. ^ Everett (1957b)
  4. ^ "The Many Worlds of Hugh Everett" by Peter Byrne, from Scientific American, December 2007
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h Peter Byrne (2010). The Many Worlds of Hugh Everett III: Multiple Universes, Mutual Assured Destruction, and the Meltdown of a Nuclear Family. Oxford University Press. p. 29. ISBN 978-0-19-955227-6.
  6. ^ a b c Shikhovstev, Eugene B.; Ford, Kenneth W. (2003). "Everett". Retrieved December 30, 2019.
  7. ^ Fabio Freitas (2007). Os estados relativos de Hugh Everett III: uma análise histórica e conceitual [The relative states of Hugh Everett III: a historical and conceptual analysis] (PDF) (Thesis) (in Brazilian Portuguese). Graduate Program in Teaching, Philosophy and History of Sciences, Federal University of Bahia. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 18, 2008. Retrieved December 18, 2008 – via ppgefhc.ufba.br.
  8. ^ "Obituary for Harvey J. Arnold". stubbsconner.com. Stubbs Conner Funeral Home & Cremation Services. 2013. Retrieved December 22, 2022.
  9. ^ a b c d Mark Oliver Everett (2007). Things the Grandchildren Should Know. Little, Brown Book Group Limited. ISBN 978-0-316-02787-8.
  10. ^ a b Eugene Shikhovtsev. "Biographical Sketch of Hugh Everett, III". Max Tegmark – via space.mit.edu.
  11. ^ Olival Freire Jr (2005). "Science and exile: David Bohm, the hot times of the Cold War, and his struggle for a new interpretation of quantum mechanics". arXiv:physics/0508184.
  12. ^ Freire, Olival (2005). "Science and exile: David Bohm, the cold war, and a new interpretation of quantum mechanics" (PDF). Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences. 36: 1–34. doi:10.1525/hsps.2005.36.1.1. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 26, 2012. Retrieved August 7, 2011.
  13. ^ Everett, Hugh (1957). On the foundations of quantum mechanics.
  14. ^ Wheeler, John A. (1957). "Assessment of Everett's "Relative State Formulation of Quantum Theory". Reviews of Modern Physics. 29 (3): 463–465. Bibcode:1957RvMP...29..463W. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.463.
  15. ^ Hugh Everett III and George E. Pugh, "The Distribution and Effects of Fallout in Large Nuclear-Weapon Campaigns", in Biological and Environment Effects of Nuclear War, Hearings Before the Special Sub-Committee on Radiation of the Joint Congressional Committee on Atomic Energy, June 22–26, 1959, Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1959.
  16. ^ Cf. Dr. Linus Pauling Nobel Peace Prize 1962 lecture (and reprinted in Peace by Frederick W. Haberman, Irwin Abrams, Tore Frängsmyr, Nobelstiftelsen, Nobelstiftelsen (Stockholm), published by World Scientific, 1997 ISBN 981-02-3416-3), delivered on December 11, 1963, in which he mentioned the work by Pugh and Everett regarding the risks of nuclear profliferation and even quoted them from 1959. Pauling said: "This is a small nuclear attack made with use of about one percent of the existing weapons. A major nuclear war might well see a total of 30,000 megatons, one-tenth of the estimated stockpiles, delivered and exploded over the populated regions of the United States, the Soviet Union, and the other major European countries. The studies of Hugh Everett and George E. Pugh [21], of the Weapons Systems Evaluation Division, Institute of Defense Analysis, Washington, D.C., reported in the 1959 Hearings before the Special Subcommittee on Radiation, permit us to make an estimate of the casualties of such a war. This estimate is that sixty days after the day on which the war was waged, 720 million of the 800 million people in these countries would be dead, sixty million would be alive but severely injured, and there would be twenty million other survivors. The fate of the living is suggested by the following statement by Everett and Pugh: 'Finally, it must be pointed out that the total casualties at sixty days may not be indicative of the ultimate casualties. Such delayed effects as the disorganization of society, disruption of communications, extinction of livestock, genetic damage, and the slow development of radiation poisoning from the ingestion of radioactive materials may significantly increase the ultimate toll.' ..."
  17. ^ a b c d e f g h i Osnaghi, Stefano; Freitas, Fabio; Olival Freire, Jr (2009). "The Origin of the Everettian Heresy" (PDF). Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 40 (2): 97–123. Bibcode:2009SHPMP..40...97O. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.10.002. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 28, 2016. Retrieved August 12, 2009.
  18. ^ "The Many Worlds of Hugh Everett". Scientific American.
  19. ^ Aldhous, Peter (November 24, 2007). "Parallel lives can never touch". New Scientist. No. 2631. Retrieved November 21, 2007.
  20. ^ Woolf, Harry. "Some strangeness in the proportion. A centennial symposium to celebrate the achievements of Albert Einstein." Some strangeness in the proportion. A centennial symposium to celebrate the achievements of Albert Einstein. 1980. pg 385
  21. ^ Gardner, Martin (July 2003). "Multiverses and Blackberries". Are Universes Thicker Than Blackberries?. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-05742-3.
  22. ^ "ihear iha – annotating speech in the IHA phonetic alphabet". ihear. Monowave Corporation. April 10, 2022. Retrieved March 9, 2023.
  23. ^ Peter Byrne (2010). The Many Worlds of Hugh Everett III: Multiple Universes, Mutual Assured Destruction, and the Meltdown of a Nuclear Family. Oxford University Press. p. 352. ISBN 978-0-19-955227-6. A few days after her 39th birthday, Liz succeeded in killing herself ... She left a note, that read, in part: '... Please sprinkle me in water...or the garbage, maybe that way I'll end up in the correct parallel universe w/ Daddy.'
  24. ^ Banks-Smith, Nancy (November 27, 2007). "Last night's TV: Parallel Worlds, Parallel Lives" (TV review). The Guardian.
  25. ^ "Parallel Worlds, Parallel Lives BBC Four documentary about Eels founder Mark Everett and his father". BandWeblogs.com. November 16, 2007. Archived from the original on February 14, 2008.
  26. ^ "Parallel Worlds, Parallel Lives". bbc.co.uk (Press release). BBC.
  27. ^ Parallel Worlds, Parallel Lives (BBC iPlayer). bbc.co.uk. BBC.
  28. ^ "Parallel Worlds, Parallel Lives". Nova. PBS. October 2008.
  29. ^ Pat Healy (October 21, 2008). "'Nova' came for his soul: Eels front man on the healing power of a science doc about his dad". Metro. Archived from the original on July 15, 2011.
  30. ^ Jordan Lite; George Musser (October 21, 2008). "Hugh Everett: New film tackles 'many worlds' theory of quantum mechanics" (blog). 60 second science, Scientific American.

Many-worlds sources

[edit]

Operations research sources

[edit]

Biographical sources

[edit]
[edit]
Wikiquote has quotations related to Hugh Everett III.

Archival collections

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hugh_Everett_III&oldid=1243612492"