Talk:Metalepsis

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics / Philosophy of language Mid‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.

Philosophy: Language Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of language

Iceland Low‑importance

	Iceland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IcelandWikipedia:WikiProject IcelandTemplate:WikiProject IcelandIceland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Would this include Cockney rhyming slang? Like (example stolen from the recent movie Ocean's 11): "We're in Barney" refers to "Barney Rubble" rhymes with "trouble" means "We're in trouble." One of those connections is, perhaps, Metonymy (name-for-name); I'm not sure the rhyming connection fits any rule of metonymy I know.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.185.179.196 (talk) 00:21, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC).

I think that's a perfect example. Metalepsis is, as the article say, often a combination of other figures of speech -- in this case, a special kind of metonymy (using a name for another name that's associated it) and then the rhyming substitution (I don't know what to call that -- it's a kind of euphemism, I suppose).

Tom 11:46, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Using 'Metalepsis' in a bigger way

Russel Samolsky is the author of a book titled Metaleptic Machines: Kafka, Kabbalah, Shoah.

Kabbalah, for one, is a tree of associations and symbolically connected ideas.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.208.134.206 (talk) 22:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Is this an example?

I wonder if "does the Pope shit in the woods?" is a double metalepsis. Maproom (talk) 10:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are probably correct. But since we we aren't trying to define 'double metslepsis' with this page, your 'contribution' is off-topic and irrelevant. It is also inappropriate (kids read these pages) and probably offensive (to billion+ Catholics). CalgarHorseman (talk) 09:49, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NOTCENSORED, your last point is irrelevant. Further, if there are sources describing double metalepses, this would probably be the best article to explain the concept. --HerrWaus (talk) 22:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metalepsis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721081919/http://honeyl.public.iastate.edu/quintilian/8/chapter6.html to http://honeyl.public.iastate.edu/quintilian/8/chapter6.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak

The middle two sections, "In Icelandic literature" and "Other uses", are weak. The first is obscure and specialized and doesn't explain what the metalepsis is. The second is three statements about metalepsis without explanation or examples. 2001:171B:2274:7C21:C4E:70D2:562B:16C3 (talk) 10:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]