User talk:Ashl

Wow this is My Page... wonder if this will appear on google? Heres my site about a pet Rock named Boulder... Take a look at Boulder the Great.

You don't need to double-link the bands/performers on the Live 8 page. Cheers. --Madchester July 3, 2005 17:36 (UTC)

Possibly fixed now probably an error in the system somewhere, sorry for your trouble.

My apologies for the co-incidental block. Someone using your IP address was doing stupid edits and I had to block their IP address to prevent it. You were just caught in the cross-fire. The block was only for a short time and should be over by now. Hopefully it won't happen again. Sorry again. DJ Clayworth 04:29, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nathan Porritt

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nathan Porritt, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Porritt (2nd nomination). Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 20:19, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Du the Dudek

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Du the Dudek, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non notable novelty song

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 22:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nathan Porritt

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nathan Porritt, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Has not played fully professional football, fails WP:ATHLETE

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stu.W UK (talk) 09:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nathan Porritt

I have nominated Nathan Porritt, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Porritt (3rd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Stu.W UK (talk) 12:22, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]