Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadrach
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Xezbeth 06:45, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
Entirely free of meaningful content. Denni☯ 01:34, 2005 May 21 (UTC)
Delete--W(t) 02:02, 2005 May 21 (UTC)- Delete, not notable, obvious vanity: There is a man in Orange County, California who's name is Sadrac and is considered to be one of the best looking Male Model to come out of Orange County. Megan1967 02:35, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I totally reworked the article. Notable Biblical character, among other things. Frankly, I'm stunned that we didn't have a Shadrach article already. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:45, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, great article. Kappa 03:07, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A disambig page with, count 'em, ZERO links! What good does this serve other than to add some trivial facts about a word? Harro5 04:00, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Nice job on the expansion. Tufflaw 06:05, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Nicely expanded. NatusRoma 06:38, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Well done Andrew. Capitalistroadster 07:01, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Good save - keep. I've added a few more links, and intriguingly we have an article on Abednego, but none of Meshach. Andrew...? Grutness...wha? 08:10, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Informative one . The first few versions were stupid though .--IncMan 11:57, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, as per Harro5 --nixie 14:39, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, looks great now. --Fazdeconta 15:56, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Good save-- Keep Notable Bible. Klonimus 19:52, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but there are three characters, and they're always together in the Bible. I'm wondering if treating them separately is profitable. Perhaps a write up at Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego and redirects from each name? At least I'm not aware of the three men having a backstory. Geogre 02:35, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep now the article looks fine Yuckfoo 02:54, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Because when I need to find trivial facts about a word, I go to Wikipedia. Go editors, down with deleters. Dystopos 06:46, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep--MarSch 13:58, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep article as it stands is reasonable. DES 17:09, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.