Talk:Roman Breviary

Catholicism Mid‑importance

Roman Breviary is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Links

Obviously this should link to an article on the Liturgy of the Hours, but I don't know if one exists (or if not, what to call one).

Liturgy of the Hours works :) Secretlondon 23:58, Dec 21, 2003 (UTC)

Doh, I'm an idiot. :)

Comment

"In the early days of Christian worship, when Jewish custom was followed, the Bible furnished all that was thought necessary, containing as it did the books from which the lessons were read and the psalms that were recited."

If it means the Tanakh or Old Testament, then I guess this is correct. Otherwise this might violate NPOV and suggest "Sola Scriptura" and is not factually true as the New Testament Canon at that time did not exist. --208.49.131.4 (talk) 15:23, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Under the section "The Proprium Sanctorum", the last sentence reads "Covering a great stretch of time and space, they do for the worshipper in the field of church history what the Scripture readings do in that of biblical history."

I can't understand this sentence. I think it needs to be clearer. Harrington (talk) 22:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gregory DiPippo's Historical Overview

Is available on the web at this site. Rwflammang (talk) 09:29, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting

This should be turned into a more or less "regular" Wikipedia article without losing too much of the expert information contained in it. The article started out as a copy-paste of the (public domain) Catholic Encyclopedia article (Cabrol 1907). This was added in 2007[1] and pretty much left alone since then. The 2007 addition of Cabrol's text however left in place material added 2002-2006[2]. Some of the "strange" material goes back to these early days of Wikipedia when it was common usage to just add basic information on a topic without references just to start off a new page. It should be noted that until 2015, this page was under the title of "Breviary"[3]. The new page Breviary is an ill-advised stub page created at the time[4], with no potential to develop independently of Liturgical book and Roman Breviary. It should become a disambiguation page, or merged back into either Liturgical book or Roman Breviary. --dab (𒁳) 12:24, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]