Talk:Alexandra Palace

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on June 9, 2012.

London High‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Darts High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Darts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Darts-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DartsWikipedia:WikiProject DartsTemplate:WikiProject DartsDarts articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ice Hockey

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Gracie Fields and Ally Pally - do we have an RS?

We say in the lead that Gracie Fields is claimed to have called it Ally Pally. In my (yes, valueless) personal opinion it seems unlikely that she actually invented the phrase, though she may have popularized it; it seems such an obvious thing to call it that I'd be surprised if no-one before Fields had thought of it, so that she was able to unleash the idea newly-formed on an unsuspecting world. So, I guess my question boils down, really to "Is this an RS for the assertion?" Whaddya think? DBaK (talk) 17:58, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Very unlikely, in my "view". Hardly a reliable source on its own. I would not support it. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 19:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

...38 months later ... I have removed the claim, DBaK.Cheers! ‑ ‑ Gareth Griffith‑Jones ^{The Welsh Buzzard} ‑ ‑ 10:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gareth Griffith-Jones tsk, such haste! When will you young people learn not to rush into things? Honestly. I was going to convene a nice little Steering Group and make sandwiches and everything and you've just dashed in and done it! :) DBaK (talk) 22:36, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, ha!

‑ ‑ Gareth Griffith‑Jones ^{The Welsh Buzzard} ‑ ‑ 09:19, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Sounds like hyperbole rather than descriptive"?

How can remarkable be described as "Sounds like hyperbole rather than descriptive"?
I replaced historic, which is ambivalent, with remarkable; the dates within the Lead section explain the actual history.
If you don't understand, look it up in a dictionary ‑ ‑ Gareth Griffith‑Jones ^{The Welsh Buzzard} ‑ ‑ 11:07, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My reasoning is that 'remarkable' suggests someone is remarking on its significance, which suggests subjectivity, whilst 'historic' is merely factual. However to avoid this becoming a battle of opinions or temperaments I have removed either and hope that is an amicable solution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheWhiteJamEdits (talk • contribs) 08:31, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your reasoning is not sound on both accounts. ‑ ‑ Gareth Griffith‑Jones ^{The Welsh Buzzard} ‑ ‑ 09:17, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion 'historic' and 'remarkable' should both be avoided. Saying it's 'historic' is saying it's of historical importance, which is subjective. The same with 'remarkable', which means it's worthy of note or remark. While both these things may well be true, the opening descriptions should nevertheless be merely descriptive and factual (e.g. 'The Eiffel Tower is a wrought iron lattice tower', or 'The Great Pyramid of Giza is the oldest and largest of the three pyramids in the Giza pyramid complex'). Dubmill (talk) 09:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, thanks Dubmill — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheWhiteJamEdits (talk • contribs) 09:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Jones

My eye was caught by mention of Jones in this article. I have a v. soft spot for his work, having worked for many years at 16 Carlton House Terrace, which he redesigned (inside) in a wonderfully OTT style. I am not certain why he is listed in the info-box as one of the architects of the Ally Pally. The only mention of him in the text just says that he conceived the idea of a people's palace on the site, and there is no indication in the article that he contributed any designs to the actual building. Could someone who knows the historical facts clarify this, perhaps? Tim riley talk 10:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Series 60 of Later… with Jools Holland

Series 60 of Later… with Jools Holland is being recorded in the Alexandra Palace Theatre. First show on Saturday 14th May 2022 at 21:55 on BBC2. 82.14.68.181 (talk) 11:29, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name

The name of the palace being after the name of the park is implied within the article, but isn't clear. It would be good to add this information somewhere so that people know that it inherits it's name from Edward VII's wife. 31.94.4.230 (talk) 22:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]