User talk:Karada

The Hoffman-Singleton Graph Image

Hello comrade, this is AFOH, (talk), and some time ago i posted the best image for that graph i could find, trying to expand the stub content...I couldn't prove that the image i found was released for free use, but however the stub remains stub, and there is no solution to this point. Hope someone helps. Thanks.

Sexual Attraction

Howdy. I placed a note to you on the discussion page of sexual attraction and had not heard from you, yet. KeyStroke

Your uploaded image

Thanks for uploading Image:Arabic alphabet.png. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know whether it's released under the GFDL, whether fair use is claimed, or what? Thanks, – Quadell ^{(talk) (help)}[[]] 18:39, Oct 1, 2004 (UTC)

That's good enough evidence for me to say it's GFDL. – Quadell ^{(talk) (help)}[[]] 12:23, Oct 3, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started the Free the Rambot Articles Project which has the goals of getting users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to...

1. ...all U.S. state, county, and city articles...
2. ...all articles...

using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) version 1.0 and 2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to the GFDL (which every contribution made to Wikipedia is licensed under), but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles (See the Multi-licensing Guide for more information). Since you are among the top 1000 most active Wikipedians, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles.

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} template (or {{MultiLicensePD}} for public domain) into their user page, but there are other templates for other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} with {{MultiLicensePD}}. If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know at my talk page what you think. -- Ram-Man 20:33, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

The Humungous Image Tagging Project

Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

There is already a Category:Eastenders characters

Other characters are already categorized there, which is a subcategory of Category:Soap opera characters. There is currently no Category:EastEnders. For now, I would suggest having the two not categorized (which I actually just did move) to Category:Eastenders characters, and then putting that up for renaming at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. Thanks.

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/68.170.0.238

Any chance you'd be willing to contribute to this RfC? RickK 04:43, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

Aetherometry

Two questions

• I was wondering why you removed DeMeo's criticms of the Correas
• Have you read some of the articles on the Correa's web site? Whoever writes them seems to me to be using the same abusive/contemptuous/mocking style as Helicoid and our anons. I strongly suspect that we are debating the Correas themselves. Gets to the whole idea of not editing articles about yourself. Guettarda 2 July 2005 14:56 (UTC)

Two answers:

• I didn't: I just cited it in-line in the text of the article. Please feel free to replace it.
• That's a very interesting thought.

-- Karada 2 July 2005 14:59 (UTC)

BTW - the anon IPs are, for the most part, from Toronto and Hamilton Guettarda 2 July 2005 15:11 (UTC)

Fascinating. Akronos Publishing gives its address as being in Concord, Ontario. Those three locations are rather close together. [1] -- Karada 2 July 2005 15:24 (UTC)

Disclaimers

Hi,

if you insert disclaimers by using their MediaWiki name (see Wikipedia:MediaWiki custom messages), we can easily update these messages in all articles that use them. Besides, it saves typing. For the risk disclaimer, use {{msg:risk}}.—Eloquence 22:41, Dec 12, 2003 (UTC)

---

Khmer Rouge

Opps! Edit conflict. Sorry - I'll merge in your edits. -mav

VFD of MiseTings?

Hello. I noticed you put a VFD tag on the MiseTings article and then reverted it. Was this because it's just been through two in the past several months/weeks or for other reasons? I'm just a big patron of the article and I'd like to satisfy my curiosity. Take care! Mr Bound July 5, 2005 20:35 (UTC)

It was because I noticed that it had survived VfD twice recently. -- Karada 6 July 2005 20:25 (UTC)

Edit of terrorism page

Because I didn't write it. Someone removed the part called "Other world leaders" so I was looking for it in History, I found it and forgot to read all the quotes, so that one slipped in. I removed it when I saw it. If you do not believe me, check history and you can see that I did not write it. It was a glip on my part and I am truly sorry. Havok 7 July 2005 12:43 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. -- Karada 7 July 2005 12:46 (UTC)

No problem, I found the vandal though. This is the person who added it [2] Havok 7 July 2005 12:53 (UTC)

lost vote

Karada, I lost your vote in Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Totally Obvious when I reverted some vandalism. Do you want to re-vote, or do you want me to copy/paste your previous vote? Sorry. Joyous (talk) 22:05, July 19, 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Dealing with AOL vandals

Hi there! That page sounds like a good idea; do you intend to finish it? Because presently it's not really helpful, I'm afraid. I would suggest userfying it may be useful. Radiant_>|< 09:37, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

Re Dr Vicki Shiran

I changed the page. it is more informative now

Brandy Snifter Gyros

Are called "Hemispherical Resonator Gyros". User:Ray Van De Walker

Conflict of interests and Notability.

Conflict of interest

While the connection between myself and Squitti's is quite evident, no action was taken to conceal this, however how about those who do.

How about those who use a non-real name ? How about those who work for related companies ? How can you tell whether they are "related", or even part of a related marketing company  ?

=Notable

"Notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice". It is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance". Please consider notable and demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education. Large organizations are likely to have more readily available verifiable information from reliable sources that provide evidence of notability; however, smaller organizations can be notable, just as individuals can be notable, and arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations."

Squitti's has, sponsored research into the discovery of anti-truths, what I believe to be a great philosophical error that has gone undetected since the days of Adam and Eve. The impact on culture, on society, and all the related areas of association is tremendous.

Any way...thanks for your time.

Thanks

Hi no problem about my "Dave" edits. That user is blocked now for being mistaken for one of those Anti Vandle bots or whatever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.64.53.30 (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lexical environment

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Lexical environment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Postcard Cathy (talk)