User talk:Vortexentity
I am a long time supporter of efforts to free humankind from the shackles of oppressive socialist, and communist governments. Having worked on this effort for the US government while enlisted and serving in Berlin Germany during the cold war. I saw first hand the work of the communist and socialist in converting their populations into dosicle slaves who work for peanuts and can thank their big brother government for both their free medical care, and long food lines.
While training to become an expert in MOUT infantry tactics while stationed in Berlin I spent most of my free time in the fabulous libraries in Berlin instead of the drinking establishments. This gave me a unique opportunity to find out a great deal about the world and Europe in particular.
Unique in all of the world were a small band of idealist that had considered another way to govern themselves. This project and planned community far out to sea called New Utopia attracted my interest a great deal since it was not like any socialist ideal but a social structure built on hard work and constant effort to achieve.
It would not attract socialist or communist as it allows no way for any socialist group of people to over breed or migrate on top of the existing population so they can vote them out using democracy and take over government.
It is established on Libertarian principles that are locked into place with the establishment of a Constitutional monarchy that is kept in line with a constitution that allows for the highest level of freedom and privacy available in any place on the Earth. To me that is a vision worthy of supporting.
New Utopia is only becoming a reality because bold and tireless visionaries work on this dream every day to make it a reality. People looking from the outside that can see nothing of this effort but a web site are not in a place to judge the efforts of the people who are working on this project.
My main focus in life is science and technology. My primary focus in this area is in development of business to find new energy and propulsion technology. My work with New Utopia is as primary creative and technical consulting with the Monarchy. I consult in all areas of technology but mostly in computers, and communications, energy, construction materials, and defense technologies.
My personal interest include martial science, 3D computer modeling, photography, exploring, reading.
I would discribe myself as a militant-utopian-technologist, and early transhumanist.
Hi there. Please note that the changes you're making to the above article do not comply with a number of key Wikipedia content policies, among them WP:V and WP:NPOV. Please familiarise yourself with these and other applicable policies, and do not revert the article again without first discussing your reasons on the article talk page. --Gene_poole 03:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. The statements within the article that you are trying to remove are fully referenced and properly cited. They do not constitute "slander". If you wish to promote an alternative viewpoint you are welcome to do so, but you will need to ensure your statements are supported by appropriately cited reliable, non-trivial third party references. --Gene_poole 03:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
With regard to your recent edits to New Utopia, I would like to suggest that you review our "conflict of interest" guideline. If you do indeed have a conflict of interest with the subject of the article, you are asked to "avoid, or exercise great caution when ... [e]diting articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with". If you do not have a conflict of interest, as defined here, with the subject of the article (i.e., New Utopia), please disregard this comment. Thank you, Black Falcon (Talk) 04:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- I can certainly understand your passion and I personally took no offense at your remarks; my concern was that others might. So that discussion is not spread out over three pages, I suggest that we limit it to the talk page of the article. I have made another edit, removing some more unsourced and disputed content from the "infobox" at the top right of the page. Regarding your most recent comment at my talk page ... it may be the case that you do not see that "good faith can ... be clearly established", but the premise of Wikipedia:Assume good faith is that one should assume good faith, even when there is no evidence of it. One should only drop the assumption of good faith in the presence of evidence to the contrary. I believe that the slant of the article is a direct result of the content of the reliable sources included in it. In any case, I think the best solution would be to comment specifically on the content of the article and not speculate about the intentions of its editors. I will shortly place another comment at Talk:New Utopia. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 05:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 21:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Possibly unfree File:Combined-data-fields01.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Combined-data-fields01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 18:47, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
