User talk:Treborbassett
Hi, firstly, thanks for your excellent contributions, specifically Extensive form game, however, could you explain your reasoning for deleting some content from Perfect information?. thanks Bluemoose 16:05, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for the thanks for the thanks, I assumed you were right judging from the quality of your other articles. Didn't patronise don't worry, I assume you have phd/ma or something? p.s. in a spare moment could you take a look at Bertrand competition, as you are the most knowledgeable I have encountered, i'm not convinced it will make sense to anyone other than me. thanks again Bluemoose 16:42, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
requested econ articles
[edit]Hi, I'm not sure if you know about the requested articles page? Anyway, a lot of them just need to be redirected e.g. I redirected X-inefficiency model to X-inefficiency, and many look like game theory that could either be redirected or even made as articles, but i'm not sure, for example Weak incentive Screening game Strategy-proof Strategic form Individually rational, the reason i am saying this is that you clearly know your game theory, so if you can see where these and others could be redirected to that would be great. thanks Bluemoose 13:45, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Marginal benefit
[edit]Is Marginal benefit not just another term for marginal utility, if not then the difference should be defined, otherwise it should be redirected. thanks Bluemoose 15:19, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Non-credible threats
[edit]hi, noticed you made a redirect to dynamic inconsistency for Noncredible threats, hope you dont mind, but i made a page for it instead, as i dont think they are related enough, certainly dynamic inconsistency doesnt mention threats. thanks Bluemoose 14:18, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | The image mage:Extensive form game 3.1.JPG has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information. |
Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 00:10, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for tagging this image. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 14:34, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
Game theory
[edit]Trebor - You seem to know a thing or two about game theory. As we mentioned before, I think wikipedia needs a bit of work in this area. I have added a few pages, but my knowledge is somewhat limited. My research focuses mostly on evolutionary game theory, less on the standard equilibrium refinements. Are you a pro in this field? I have entertained the idea of starting a WikiProject on game theory. Is this something you would be interested in? Do you know others that might be interested as well? --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 08:46, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
- I'm sending out feelers to see if folk's are interested. So far the count is up to 5, we'll see how it goes. For the time being, would you mind taking a look at this page User:Kzollman/Matrix? I'm trying to decide on a standard representation for games. Feel free to add and modify the page to your heart's desire.
Okay, its official. I have recruited 5 to 6 people to join, I think with the project we can probably cajole three more people (which might increase their participation). I have started the page at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Game theory. There is a lot of advertising and such to do, which I will do in the next few days. Hope to see you there! --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 23:38, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
Useful websites
[edit]Here they are:
[1] [2] [3] [4] FYI:[5] (this is combinatorial but an interesting read) [6] [7] [8]
Possibly unfree Image:Bod_card.JPG
[edit]An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bod_card.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 06:07, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)