User talk:Jord

Welcome to my talk page, please click the [+] next to "edit this page" at the top of your screen to add a comment.

For comments during 2004 and 2005, please see /Archive01
For comments during 2006, please see /Archive02

Edmond Blanchard NPOV Dispute

Hi there; I am sorry I did not put this in right away, but I was rushed. please see Talk:Edmond Blanchard for my short comments. Thanks for your attention. Shagmaestro 04:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wind-class icebreaker

Hi, thanks for your help on the Wind-class icebreaker article, but unfortunately the Canadian Forces Maritime Command was not an entity until February 1, 1968, and the HMCS Labrador was in service with the Royal Canadian Navy from 1954 through 1958. I have therefore reverted your edit to point to the correct historical article so that the history of this ship class stays in the proper context. Maxarre 04:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thx for the article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.164.3.233 (talk) 11:35, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Allison-brewer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Allison-brewer.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Can you help me understand what is going on at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedophobia and whether I should continue to try to "save" the article? I'm not sure what the etiquette is, aside from stepping back - but if I don't who will?!? Thanks. Freechild 07:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I appreciate the input. Freechild 18:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bobrae-premier.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bobrae-premier.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 14:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Frankmckenna.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Frankmckenna.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 14:19, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Allison-brewer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Allison-brewer.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 14:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image page does in fact say who created the contect - her leadership campaign - and that it was distributed freely. - Jord 15:40, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Being "distributed freely" doesn't implyies it's free to be used for any purpose. For instance, if we can't modify the image, it's not free enough for Wikipedia (because Wikipedia's content is supposed to be modifiable by anyone. I'm listing the image for deletion. --Abu Badali 22:45, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better Source Request for Image:Allison-brewer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Allison-brewer.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. MECU≈talk 20:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All the information you posted on my talk page would be awesome to have on the image description page. You should put all that on the talk page and you can remove the BSR template. Every little bit helps when trying to determine source information. That url has an email we can use for more information too, for example.--MECU≈talk 20:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I removed the IFD since it was listed on Jan21, admins processed that date and didn't delete this image, so I guess the result was Keep/No consensus, though the IFD doesn't say anything. I would recommend that you actually use this under fair use by using Template:Non-free fair use in because the restrictions that "we cannot modify it" are a limitation that is not compatible with the GFDL. You have a strong argument for justifying the use (read: rationale) of this image already on the image: she is retired from public life, making the likelihood of a free image being created or found very small (you can put that on the description page as well). See WP:FURG for help in writing the rationale (but you're halfway done!). I think this image will be kept around here (provided it's used) for a long, long time. --MECU≈talk 20:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Rae image

What discussion? On the image's talk page, there was no dispute that it was acceptable. On the more broad discussion page, it was not disputed. An administrator, User:Zanimum, removed your tag for deletion and declared that the image should be kept. Is your complaint that it is the lead photo? The image belongs with the infobox which is at the lead, if so, I will move it down the article. - Jord 16:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was referring the unfinished discussion at the image's talk page. User:Zanimum is the admin that had committed most image abuses that I'm aware of. I would suggest you to avoid his guidance. We don't use unfree image to depict living people, and we don't need an image him young just because the article mentions what he did when he was young. --Abu Badali 17:09, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Allison-brewer.jpg

Image has been restored. Please link to the correct article. -Nv8200p talk 16:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad things got worked out in the end. However, I'm not an admin, yet. :) --MECU≈talk 22:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Children of the Prime Ministers afd

Hi there. Think you can help us save this article? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children of the Prime Ministers of Canada. Thanks Jord. -- Earl Andrew - talk 01:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your vote to keep on the article on their children, but they have put this one (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parents of the Prime Ministers of Canada) on AfD as well. -- Earl Andrew - talk 17:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me as an Advocate on the Sulla Article

Hi I am in a dispute with Vpf15 over one section of Sulla and as a history buf, I thought you maybe best able o help resolve it:

This lesson in supreme confidence, Caesar later ridiculed - "Sulla did not know his political ABCs". In retrospect, of the two, Sulla was to have the last laugh, as it was he who died in his own bed ^[1].

Vpf15 is now removing links validating my point - "Sulla was to have the last laugh, as it was he who died in his own bed"

An help, advice, arbitration etc... you can give will be much appreciated...( fairly full section on this at the end of article discussion page). regards Sulla16 2-25-07

Hi. I am removing PoV comments. Expressions such as "lesson in supreme confidence" and "to have the last laugh" don't belong in a factual article. As it stands, the text is PoV and I am removing it. Instead of rewriting it to more neutral wording, Sulla 16 is expanding the text to make it even more PoV. Sulla16 seems like a wikipedia neophyte, so I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, but he should learn to initiate compromise. Vincent 01:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I do not have time to take this on at present. I suggest you open a request for advocacy or, if more appropriate, request for moderation. - Jord 22:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Govt-Can-chart.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Govt-Can-chart.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 08:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ShawnGraham-premier.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ShawnGraham-premier.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 21:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bobrae-premier.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bobrae-premier.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 48 hours after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 20:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rayfrenette.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Rayfrenette.png. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 17:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom

Hi, why was I left out of the Abu Badali ArbCom? Can you add me, please? Badagnani 10:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for a slow response

You posted during a time where I was reassessing my desire to participate in Wikipedia, which is still ongoing. However, in regards to you arbitration request, I have had no personal run-ins with User:Abu_badali, only bearing witness to a pattern of orphaning that appears to be a violation of WP:NOT#SOAP against fair use criteria. After review, this user's edits do not strike me as being in good faith. And I feel it fairly clear that he is targeting users that stand up to him or speak out against him by going through their contributions with the intent to orphan their images, , which is WP:HAR#Wikistalking. Additionally I note that his user page even declares his intention as such with the phrase "Expect me to read through your logs." You may cite me, and I am willing to sign to the effect. However, I have nothing to really add beyond this. -- jsa 02:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nb1999.PNG

I am afraid I have marked this file as replaceable fair use, because it could be re-created from the scratch using a free map of the province, from the original data. - Mike Rosoft 13:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please be my AMA, they are torture me too much

Hello, I used to post on my room-mates acount name Babalooo and just started this name. Some others are torturing me on the Babalooo name account saying I am Rootlogy and put a giant warning label there too many times. Mostly Hipocrite is his name. Only the administrators are to put the warning labels yes? I have only made too few posts but they are on 9/11 to proof the many errors and lies of the top USA Bush administrations about 9/11 (like President Bush reading for too long, and Mr Andy Card starts saying that President Bush left the schoolroom as soon as he told him of the attacks one year after. The teacher says this also) There is no mention of any of the errors of the Bush administrations in any of the 9/11 articles that I read and I want to add a tiny little bit so they torture me. Did you know that I add that President Bush was first against the 9/11 commission and they remove this even? There is a conspiracy to not mention any errors by President Bush administrations or the mysteries. This is a plot and coverup by the Bushistas yes? They just threw away Lovelight who writes so well and are torturing Mr Baseball. I feel like a prisoner at Abu Gharib. Too much torture on me. I thank you to help me. Qué Chévere! 07:01, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Abu badali

Would you possibly be able to help guide Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abu badali towards Abitration or would you konw of someone who could help? I note that you created User:Jord/ArbCom-Abu badali so it appears you have some interest in this. Months after my last contact with Abu badali, he has just returned to his old ways by nominating for deletion images which have already been specifically reviewed and cleared by an administrator. I am spitting mad over this, and the fact that another editor who has also had trouble with him in the past has again been targetted, and I want some action. There is clearly strong support in favour of something needing to be done, but I don't feel confident enough in the process etc to create an Arbitration Case. PageantUpdater User Talk Review me! 03:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Allison-brewer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Allison-brewer.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 23:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did. See my comments on the talk page of Allison Brewer. ed g2s • talk 11:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Arbitration

Abu badali, due to your continued tagging of justified images and refusal to participate in a fair and open minded debate on their merits, your non response to your six month old RfC and your stalking and harrassment of users, I and several others have launched an arbitration against you. Jord 17:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. I will put it on my watchlist. Hopefully, everything will be cleared. --Abu badali ^(talk) 17:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Note, you are expected to respond on the arbitration page here. - Jord 17:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What am I expected to respond? I can think of anything to add at this moment. Am I missing something? --Abu badali ^(talk) 17:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is up to you, but you have the right to rebut our claims about your activity. - Jord 17:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'll be watching it closely and, if I think some claim needs and/or deserves rebuttal, I may drop an opinion. --Abu badali ^(talk) 17:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to deal with this creep. Jeffpw 20:59, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not make personal attacks. Picaroon (Talk) 20:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see the arbitration has been accepted by 5 members, so it will proceed. Must I make a statement at this time, or will I be asked to at a later date? I have never been involved in an arbitration before, so I am unclear as to what I must do. Thanks, Jeffpw 09:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You do not need make a statement, but you should feel free to provide evidence regarding the conduct of involved parties at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abu badali/Evidence. Picaroon (Talk) 20:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abu badali

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abu badali. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abu badali/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abu badali/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (Talk) 20:07, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some images

I'm avoiding the automated messages to prevent any extra stress. While reviewing the page List of New Brunswick premiers I've noticed the image Image:Richardhatfield.jpg lack verifiable source information. Is this image really owned by the Canadian government?

Also, Image:Louisrobichaud1960s.jpg, tagged as PD, lacks any source info. Just like Image:JohnMcNair.jpg.

I haven't examined all the images in the article.

As a side question, being just a "list" article, do you believe the usage of unfree material is justified?

Hope you take this in the spirit it's was meant to. Best regards, --Abu badali ^(talk) 18:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, isn't Image:Camille theriault.jpg a non-commerical-only licensed image? --Abu badali ^(talk) 18:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Brunswick premier images

With respect to your comments...

1.) With respect to the use of unfree material on list pages, I have no opinion on that matter, I am not a lawyer and I am not familiar with copyright laws and liability. I do know that in general Wikipedia prefers free images, but, that when a free image is not available, unfree images are allowed on a limited basis. You should note that the last time I editted that list page, there were no images on it.

2.) With respect to the specific images you have cited, three of are dead politicians where no free replacement would be able to be found. The fourth is of a retired politician who is no a business man who I suppose a free image could be found of perhaps at the Annual General Meeting of the company he heads.

- Jord 20:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you didn't fully understood my comments (or maybe I failed to make myself clear). I didn't mentioned the question of using unfree images of living/dead people at all. I just asked for (verifiable) source information for the 3 first images and about the seemly contradictory licensing information on the last one. Let me know if I'm still not being clear. Thanks for your time. --Abu badali ^(talk) 20:35, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am still not sure I see your issues, I will go through them blow-by-blow:

Image:Richardhatfield.jpg - source, per page, "Senate of Canada"
Image:JohnMcNair.jpg - source, per page, "New Brunswick government"
Image:Camille theriault.jpg - not sure what contradiction you mean, images, per page, come from the "Transportation Safety Board" and the allowed use details are there
Image:Louisrobichaud1960s.jpg - here you are right, the source is missing, I uploaded it over 2 years ago so you'll have to excuse my memory... I am quite sure I found it by means of a Google image search. I did a Google search again now and the only results I find are a fork of Wikipedia and lower res version of the file. - Jord 21:01, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid "Senate of Canada" and "New Brunswick government" are not verifiable source information. Can you be more specific?

In Image:Camille theriault.jpg, the comments says the image can be used for "personal" use and "non-commercial use", but the tag used says "The copyright holder allows anyone to use it for any purpose". Non-comercial is surely a restriction over "any purpose". That's the contradiction that I meant.

Image:Louisrobichaud1960s.jpg was tagged for deletion. I understand you uploaded it long ago in a good faith attempt to help Wikipedia. I hope, as the experienced user you are now, you understand we can't keep this image the way it is.

Best regards, --Abu badali ^(talk) 21:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you have the time, consider adding a fair use rationale for these images, explaining why they are needed and how they are ok with our policy. Let me know if I can be of any help. --Abu badali ^(talk) 21:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've searched the Senate and New Brunswick websites and found links to the specific pages from which these images came which I hope is specific enough? I am not sure why the burden for that should be on the original uploader of an image; it seems to me that if Wikipedia wants to be the repository of as much information as possible then we should err on the side of caution and, rather than delete images as soon as their is some suspision that they are not free, work to find sources and details to justify their use. Perhaps that is overly optomistic of me.

With respect to the Theriault image, if I have selected the wrong tag, I apologize. If you would be so kind as to match the tag with the copyright information, as you seem to be far better read in areas of Wikipedia images than I, I would appreciate it.

Finally, for the Robichaud image, I do not in fact understand why it cannot be kept. It is a very useful image whose use would be justified if it was free or not, therefore why should it not be able to be kept under fair use/source unknown or some similar classification? - Jord 21:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the source information on Image:Richardhatfield.jpg and Image:JohnMcNair.jpg seems ok now. Thanks for that. I guess the burden is on the uploader exactly because the uploader is the one making the claiming about the copyright info. If I say one image is copyrighted by the "Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan", why should anyone other than me be encumbered with the task to provide evidence of this claim?

About the "Theriault image", as it's licensed for non-commercial use, the tag would be {{Db-noncom}}, that happens to be a speedy-delete tag, as Wikipedia don't accept non-commercial-only licensed material. Being unfree, this image could only be used in Wikipedia if in accordance with our policy on unfree content usage. As this image is currently being used solely to illustrate the look of a living person, I believe it fails the very first item in our's policy criteria.

About the "Robichaud image", please understand that we can't keep an image just because it's "very useful". We can never say that the image use "would be justified if it was free or not" if the source is unknown. One important point in our policy on unfree material (and in Fair Use law) is the effect in the original market role of the material. Without knowing where an image comes from, we can hardly claim that our use won't interfere withe the image's original market role. That's one of the reasons not to accept unsourced images.

Let me know if you still have any doubts or if I can still be of any help. Best regards, --Abu badali ^(talk) 12:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Louisrobichaud1960s.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Louisrobichaud1960s.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 21:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bobrae-premier.jpg

In case you haven't been informed the image has been tagged again. –– Lid^(Talk) 21:46, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cpcml.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cpcml.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 17:29, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Cpcml.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cpcml.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:29, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 17:29, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Badali

I added myself to the list. Thanks for the notice. Trevor GH5 13:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Camille_theriault.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 11:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Govt-Can-chart.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Govt-Can-chart.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 06:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DavidOrchard.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DavidOrchard.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 10:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration

Hello Jord. When you and the others requested the arbitration case on Abu badali, you stated that you thought that he should be banned for a period of time, saying "We request that User:Abu badali be banned from editing for a period of time and his activities monitored after that period to ensure he does not continue his unacceptable activity." If you are still in favor of this, please propose remedies to this effect at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abu badali/Workshop#Proposed remedies. Thank you. Picaroon (Talk) 22:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rayfrenette.png

I have tagged Image:Rayfrenette.png as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 19:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Frankmckenna.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Frankmckenna.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 17:36, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HughJohnFlemming.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:HughJohnFlemming.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 17:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abu badali closed

This arbitration case is closed and the decision has been published at the above link. Abu badali (talk · contribs) is counselled to be more patient and diplomatic with users who question his tagging of images and to work with them in a collaborative way. For the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 16:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Jack Austin; Ontario general election, 1959; Saint John Lancaster; Ontario general election, 1963; Ontario general election, 1955; Nepisiguit (electoral district); Omer Léger; Ontario general election, 1975; Saint John-Fundy; Ontario general election, 1951; Ontario general election, 1923; Ontario general election, 1929; Ontario general election, 1967; Aldéa Landry; Ontario general election, 1919; Confederation Party; Gordon Fairweather; Ontario general election, 1934; Madeleine Dubé

Cleanup: Alberta Liberal Party; Dominant-party system; Loyola Hearn
Merge: Dana Porter; Campaign finance reform; Wyatt McIntyre
Add Sources: Conservative Party of Canada (historical); Gerald Merrithew; Politics of Australia and Canada compared
Wikify: Your Political Party of British Columbia; Jim Inhofe; James Morrow (Manitoba politician)
Expand: Yasmin Ratansi; Communist Party of British Columbia; Mount Allison Mounties

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Random Smiley Award

Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

Luk suh 04:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mark Warner (Canadian politician)

An article that you have commented on in a speedy deletion process, Mark Warner (Canadian politician), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Warner (Canadian politician). Thank you. 64.231.240.167 13:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mckennabush.jpg

I have tagged Image:Mckennabush.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Calliopejen1 23:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Shawn_graham_2006.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Shawn_graham_2006.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 18:19, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Eugene McGinley. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Jonathan 03:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Oops, that was constructive, I think. —Jonathan 03:15, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JohnMcNair.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JohnMcNair.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kenzie MacKinnon

I have nominated Kenzie MacKinnon, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenzie MacKinnon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Wooyi^{Talk to me?} 01:01, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-lafond_throne.jpg

I have tagged Image:Jean-lafond_throne.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 17:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cpcml.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cpcml.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Maxime Bernier

An editor has nominated Maxime Bernier, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxime Bernier and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pcnb.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Pcnb.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Pcnb.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Pcnb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 19:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Cabinetofcanada2004.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cabinetofcanada2004.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 23:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Executive Council of New Brunswick

Your edit here regarding appointments is very misleading. I'm new so don't like to go around arbitrarily changing peoples hard work. Do you want to clarify it, or should I? Jonathan Logan (talk) 15:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Nbndp-leadership-candidates-2005.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nbndp-leadership-candidates-2005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 07:04, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Nbndp-leadership-candidates-2005.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Nbndp-leadership-candidates-2005.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.allisonbrewer.ca/vote-e.html. I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rlandmann (talk) 21:54, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Paulmartin-shawngraham.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Paulmartin-shawngraham.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 07:10, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:NewBrunswick-final2006boundaries.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:NewBrunswick-final2006boundaries.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 21:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:NewBrunswick-proposed2006boundaries.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:NewBrunswick-proposed2006boundaries.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 21:43, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:NBcabinet2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NBcabinet2006.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Opinion polling in the Canadian federal election, 2006/Old projections

The article Opinion polling in the Canadian federal election, 2006/Old projections has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lonestanding list of opinion polls of an election that's over, lacks notability, looks like it was supposed to be a subpage (?)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hekerui (talk) 11:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jord! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 24 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 699 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Eric Allaby - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Matthew Laird - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Arch Pafford - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Barry Turner - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jean-Pierre Ouellet - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Yvon Poitras - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Joel Bernard - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tony Kuo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
LeRoy Armstrong - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Omer Léger - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. James Brunton 12. R. Bruce Fitch 13. Roland Haché 14. David McLaughlin 15. Dale Graham (CEO) 16. Edwin G. Allen 17. Louis-Philippe McGraw 18. Rose-May Poirier 19. Gene Devereux 20. Stuart Jamieson 21. Larry Kennedy 22. Ron Ouellette 23. Colby Fraser 24. Jack Keir

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Dale Graham (CEO)

I have nominated Dale Graham (CEO), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dale Graham (CEO). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:21, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

56th New Brunswick Legislative Assembly‎

Hello. I am trying to clear up the backlog at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Articles_lacking_sources_from_October_2006. The article by the above title is lacking reliable sources. Can you help out? Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Colby Fraser

The article Colby Fraser has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP of a "perennial candidate" who has never been elected to anything.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jclemens-public (talk) 23:36, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michelle Hooton

The article Michelle Hooton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced WP:BLP fails WP:POLITICIAN. Deputy mayor of a small city and unsuccessful candidate for a provincial seat.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pburka (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jack MacDougall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack MacDougall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack MacDougall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 20:31, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/YPP/row

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/YPP/row requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 03:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/YPP

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/YPP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 03:58, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Green/row

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Green/row requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 07:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Green

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Green requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 17:37, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/WLP/row

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/WLP/row requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 05:40, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/WLP

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/WLP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 05:42, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Rhino/row

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Rhino/row requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 05:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/DRBC/row

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/DRBC/row requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 00:36, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/BC Unity/row

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/BC Unity/row requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 04:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/BC Unity

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/BC Unity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 04:22, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/CoR-NB/row

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/CoR-NB/row requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 21:40, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Socialist/row

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Socialist/row requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 22:33, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Anti-Confederate/row

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Anti-Confederate/row requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 23:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Jord/Constitution

User:Jord/Constitution, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jord/Constitution and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jord/Constitution during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 05:32, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kenzie MacKinnon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenzie MacKinnon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenzie MacKinnon (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 01:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Smith (Nova Scotia politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Smith (Nova Scotia politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Smith (Nova Scotia politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 01:56, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your article UNI Coopération financière

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page UNI Coopération financière to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of United States House of Representatives Republican Leader election, 2006 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United States House of Representatives Republican Leader election, 2006 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States House of Representatives Republican Leader election, 2006 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Communist Party of Canada (Marxist–Leninist) (logo).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Communist Party of Canada (Marxist–Leninist) (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]