Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DownloadStudio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Rossami (talk) 07:02, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete Appears to be a simply an advertisement Refdoc 00:54, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep I believe description is no different to FlashGet or Download Accelerator as I tried to follow as author cm224 01:40, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I have moved some links to External sections, hope it was the only reservation cm224 02:01, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I have moved some links to External sections, hope it was the only reservation cm224 02:01, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Weak keep - not that important, but not harmful either. --mav
- Comment - I've noticed that FlashGet and Download Accelerator are now marked for deletion. Note there is download manager section dedicated to this subject, listing few more programs in this category. In the name of justice all of them should be deleted. However I would not do this. It may be a hard decision, since few of them already earned "legend" status. In addition "download manager" is a description of the processes and the programs implementing them. cm224 02:30, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: This was apparently never listed on vfd, so I'm putting it on today's page. —Korath (Talk) 00:00, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, cleanup and expand. Megan1967 03:32, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep I think that software that has actively remained within the market for a reasonable amount of time and has a reasonably large user base is notable enough to deserve an entry. --Fuzzball! 22:52, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - David Gerard 09:41, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with download manager, per CM Radiant_* 12:55, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, Its useful to have a quick blurb on these kinds of software. Usually the 'official' webpage hides the facts about their own software, esp. if it has spyware or is cripple ware. Wikipedia can be a source of information on software that is NPOV, very useful as I do not think there are many places, if any, on the internet that has this information. --ShaunMacPherson 01:41, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.