Jump to content

Talk:Tariq Aziz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why is so much of his life missing?

[edit]

Tariq Aziz was one of the most important and influential men in Iraq between 1980 and 2003, I have edited a small piece of this article about his political life, but I am suprise so much of this article dwells on his life from 2003-2007, there should be more on his life. Who cares whether he acted as a 'christian', this is an encyclopedia, not a theological seminar on the nature of Christ. He was born into a Christian family and in the Muslim world that means, unless he converted to Aslam, he remains a Chaldrean Catholic Christian. Seth J. Frantzman 23:00, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have also added a biographical template to this page, it now looks like a real entry, I suggest if someone can research who were his predessecors and successors in his positions that would be great.Seth J. Frantzman 23:09, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have references to Aziz's life before 1980? Doug Youvan (talk) 20:26, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
From a reference cited in the article: "Mr Aziz, who is himself a Christian, gave himself up to US forces after the invasion of Iraq in 2003 but no charges have been brought against him." What is the background and law on this situation? Doug Youvan (talk) 20:34, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An earlier version of this articles states that his whereabouts are unknown. Has that been clarified? Doug Youvan (talk) 20:34, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Position held - DPM or VP?

[edit]

The text and infobox are currently out of sync as to whether Aziz was Deputy Prime Minister or Vice President. Since Saddam held both posts for all but three years (1991-1994) there may not be a clear answer, but if so which is correct? Timrollpickering (talk) 01:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DPM, says most news reports including this recent one from Reuters --60.240.112.112 (talk) 13:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Changed it to read Deputy Prime Minister. It appears, Taha Yassin Ramadan was the Vice President ... unless there were two Vice Presidents. -- Esemono (talk) 14:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bush quote on Aziz (2003) is historic

[edit]
Undid revision 207736308 by Nukeh-- Chaldean 01:59, 24 April 2008
Add back RfC on undoing this - It's a Bush quote on Aziz, and very historic. With no names, your POVs are suspect. - Nukeh 03:00, 24 April 2008
Ave Ceasar objected to the inclusion of the quote, and removed it, because it in his words it was, "unencyclopedic" -- Esemono (talk) 13:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why isn't a direct quote from Bush on Aziz encyclopedic? -- Nukeh 12:17, 24 April 2008
Why do you put it in the opening paragraph? Are you aware of Wikipedia:Manual of Style? Chaldean (talk) 03:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please move it as you wish. Doug Youvan (talk) 04:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Moved -- Esemono (talk) 13:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the move, that looks much better. If we can trust AP, the Bush quote is real. At this point in history (2008), it appears Bush was wrong and Aziz was right on no WMDs in Iraq. It might take 50 years to see if Bush had any reason (pun) to say this. One would have to assume that Bush knew something that is not currently known to the public. I will not comment on the probability, because that would be biased. I noticed in live coverage of the UN at the time that Aziz was treated with the utmost respect. Powell quit after those UN meetings. If Bush is in fact wrong about Aziz in this quote, the quote is a statement of an historic error in US policy. If one looks at Greenspan's new book, he too went to war over oil. If one looks at the Land Letter, Bush got moral justification from so-called Christian leaders in the US, while the Pope opposed war at every step. The price of oil is now over 4x what it was when Bush took office. No new iniatives in energy have been started by Bush (e.g., a crash nuclear reactor program coupled to water thermolysis into Hydrogen, as the French are doing). No energy conservation efforts have been pushed by Bush. My field is alternative energy, and I believe we need nuclear plant construction now, solar in the future, an abandonment of coal (pollution), and ocean Wave Power development in certain locations such as South Africa and Zealandia. I doubt that any of us want more war in the middle east. Personally, my son is at risk. He is three years old. I would gladly send him off to war to fight Adolf Hitler, but no way is he going to war over oil if my colleagues and I can provide an alternative to oil in alternative energy.Doug Youvan (talk) 14:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trial (2008)

[edit]

Esemono, could you please explain why the statement that Aziz has not been charged with any crimes has been reinstated, when he is currently on trial? Also, why should the categories "Defense Witness", "Current status", and "Trial" should come under the heading "Surrender"? q.v. contents Dirkbb (talk) 09:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit removed a ref that was used later in the article thus breaking the ref link so I reverted your edit. I don't know why "Defense Witness", "Current status", and "Trial" were placed under surrender. Maybe because it happened after he surrendered? You'd have to ask the person who did it but I don't think they should be and have since changed them, I don't think you should change them back.-- Esemono (talk) 10:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

question

[edit]

I remember his being described as the sole Shiite in Saddam's cabinet. If he was a christian, that would be even more remarkable. If he was born into a christian family, did he remain a christian? Geo Swan (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. The article needs to elaborate on this; especially in view of the fact that he visited Pope John Paul II in 2003.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Cover US Asset

[edit]

Good luck finding sources that FoxNews won't immediately accuse of being gay and black. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.13.47.4 (talk) 07:31, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Synthesis in recent edits

[edit]

I am concerned that a recent series of edits do not conform with the WP:SYNTH policy. I would like to seek other editors' opinions. Thank you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 03:06, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SYNTH example 1, SYNTH example 2. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 03:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arab Nationalism

[edit]

I believe it was common for Christians to be Arab Nationalist. As a matter of fact, the founder of the Ba'ath Party in Syria was a Christian. I suggest changing 'Although he was an Arab nationalist he was in fact an ethnic Chaldean, and a member of the Chaldean Catholic Church.' to 'He was an Arab nationalist, an ethnic Chaldean, and a member of the Chaldean Catholic Churc.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lvilla2962 (talk • contribs) 23:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Tariq Aziz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Tariq Aziz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FBI

[edit]

https://vault.fbi.gov/tariq-aziz/tariq-aziz-part-01-of-01/view

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tariq_Aziz&oldid=1205562969"