User talk:Political hack
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Gazpacho 05:44, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Tom DeLay edits
[edit]Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2005 This was the first major overhaul of federal bankruptcy law in many years.
Under the old bankruptcy law, a personal bankruptcy attorney could not be held financially responsible for his clients mendacity. Under the new bankruptcy law, the bankruptcy attorney is responsible for his client's lies to the Court about his assets and the bankruptcy attorney and his insurance carrier can be held responsible by the Bankruptcy Court.
The result is that personal bankruptcy attorneys (this does not apply to corporate bankruptcy attorneys) are likely to flee the personal bankruptcy field when the new law takes effect. Their insurance companies will not offer the sort of coverage that they would need to continue to practice.
So when consumers need to file personal bankruptcy under the new law, they will be unlikely to find a bankruptcy attorney to represent them. Consumers will have to file pro se: such consumers will be likely to fail due to the complexity of the law.
The bottom line is that the field of personal bankruptcy law as a practice area of law will cease to exist when the new bankruptcy law takes effect, and consumers will be unable to secure legal counsel and so consumers will lose what legal protections counsel now affords them.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_bankruptcy_law"
I'm afraid the reason this is nominated for deletion is that is a lot doesn't make sense. You need to specify properly the references you make, e.g. "Under the old bankruptcy law"-you need to say a named bankruptcy law and sentences like " In New York city fighting in the street, made a law get passed that the new york city most keep your things safe and you can get your thing back if you pay" simply don't make sense. The new version of the article you posted above is better though. However, there is alread an article that deals with your topic: Bankruptcy#Bankruptcy_Abuse_Prevention_.26_Consumer_Protection_Act_of_2005 Deus Ex 09:09, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
work on
[edit]Under the new bankruptcy law about one half million Americans will be forest to pay for years, decades or for life they will be held in servitude as chattel they will be completely subservient to a dominating influence of the company that holds the loan. Thier loan will be put on the maket for sale for profit. The people will be forced to work harder. People who fail to go to court will have a arrest warrant made out in thier name and people who refuse to pay. They will be subject to fines and or jail. About fifty thousand Americans will punished yearly by a fine and or about three thousand Americans every year will go to jail under the new bankruptcy law. For some people this will be a third strike they will be put in jail for life.
Federal judges found redistricting legal they wrote in there opinion that computers used, made redistricting for political partisan advantage easier. After a hard-fought campaign in 2002, now being investigated for Tom DeLay's use of corporate fundraising, the Republicans won a majority in the Texas Legislature. Swiftly, they opened up an mid-decade redistricting plan, which was accused of favoring Republicans by using computers to gerrymander the district lines. Spliting cities and fractures traditional communities. Helen Giddings added that redistricting is the most partisan issue facing the State Legislature. Subject to constitutional requirements established by case law, and in some states to review by the United States Department of Justice to ensure compliance with the federal Voting Rights Act, which bans drawing districts to reduce the voting power of ethnic minorities, the government of each state draws the boundaries for the House districts within the state's borders. While Federal law and court decisions prohibit gerrymandering districts from being drawn to reduce the voting power of protected groups such as ethnic minorities, it is perfectly legal to draw districts to favor one political party or another. Many analysts have argued that sophisticated gerrymandering computer technology plus the fundraising advantages incumbents possess have resulted in a situation where very few of the seats in the House are actually competitive. In 2002, a redistricting year, 356 House races were decided by more than 20 percent, another 41 were decided by 10 to 20 percent, only 38 were decided by less than 10 percent. Of close races, nearly all involved an open seat or a seat whose incumbent had only served one or two terms.
In 2004, nine incumbent Congressmen were defeated for reelection, two in primary races and seven in the general election. However, both of the primary losers, and four of those who lost in the general, were defeated after an unusual mid-decade redistricting warrant controversy in Texas. In only twelve other House contests with an incumbent was the election decided by less than 10 percent.
Even though only a few incumbents were defeated in 2004, the combination of retirements and resignations to run for other offices caused a nearly 10 percent turnover between the 108th and 109th Congresses. This level of turnover is common and exceeds the percentage of turnover in the U.S. Senate. However, of the vacant seats, only three changed party control.
Prison population affected by new bankruptcy law
[edit]Prison population affected by new bankruptcy law Under the new bankruptcy law about one half million Americans will be forced to pay for years, they will be held in servitude. Completely subservient to a dominating influence of the company that holds the loan. Thier loan will be put on the maket for sale for profit. The people will be forced to work harder. People who fail to go to court will have a arrest warrant made out in thier name and people who refuse to pay. They will be subject to fines and or jail. About fifty thousand Americans will punished yearly by a fine and or about three thousand Americans every year will go to jail under the new bankruptcy law. For some people this will be a third strike they will be put in jail for life.Political hack 9 July 2005 15:44 (UTC)
- This is a great place to put this. However, as this is your personal POV, please keep this out of actual bankruptcy related articles. Thanks.--Gunmetal 20:15, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
bankruptcy fraud, is a federal crime that can lead to criminal prosecution under the charge of theft of the goods or services for some people this will be a third strike they will be put in jail for life. Political hack 20:19, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
Bankruptcy fraud, is a federal felony that can lead to criminal prosecution under the charge of theft of the goods or services for some people this is can be a third strike they can be put in jail for life. The new bankruptcy law was purchased-with-creditor money, with massive quantities of dollars. Title 28 is the portion of the United States Code (federal statutory law) that governs the Federal Judicial System.
It is divided into 6 parts:
- I - Organization of Courts
- II Department of Justice
- III Court Officers and Employees
- IV Juristiction and Venue
- V Procedure
- VI Particular Proceedings
DeLay also championed the controversial Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005. Opponents of the law have noted that the credit card industry spent millions of dollars lobbying in support of the act. The Green party strongly resisted the bill because the government would become a bill collector for private companies like Sears or Diversified Collections Services. Failure to pay the government can lead to criminal prosecution under the charge of theft of goods and services or fraud, for people with two strikes this can lead to a third strike.
Bankruptcy law
[edit]Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy Code, and Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005.
the Justice Department can only give case by case bankruptcy relif for harecan katena vitemes
Justice Department can only ofer case by case bankruptcy relif for harecan katena vitemes
case by case bankruptcy relif for harecan katena vitemes the Justice Department can only ofer
2nd strike requires 80 percent of 5 year sentence for bankruptcies fraud be served in prison. Political hack 16:47, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
==
[edit]Hi
[edit]Please don't use your talk page as a scratchpad, it is very confusing if people wish to leave you messages. You must have noticed that your article is currently being considered for deletion, can I invite you to leave a (coherent) response at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two opinion of Judge Alito in bankruptcy case of doctor. Note that replacing it with different incoherent text is unlikely to help. Thanks, Morwen - Talk 12:11, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Please note that this article has been deleted, as have all the redirects created by moving the page. Mindmatrix 22:21, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Credit card companies foreclosing without a mortgage note. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ridernyc (talk) 06:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
May 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ridernyc (talk) 06:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Extraterritoriality Koch Industries Inc moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Extraterritoriality Koch Industries Inc, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Xevus11 (talk) 03:41, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Political hack. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Extraterritoriality Koch Industries Inc.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:13, 2 February 2019 (UTC)