Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mika Midolo
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 16:28, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Article about a transit reporter appearing in a single news program in Toronto. Not notable. JoaoRicardo 02:23, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete TV personalities are a tough case because they're often close to the inclusion line. Unfortunately, I'd say she's close in the wrong direction. It just seems pretty unlikely to me that someone would see a transit reporter on their local news and look that person up in a world encyclopedia. To make things worse, the first two lines are a direct copy from http://toronto.citytv.com/personalities/content/midolo_mika.asp Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:03, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, possible plagiarism. Megan1967 06:08, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. jni 11:55, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- delete. CHUM? Kevin? Liza? no relevance, poor article, i suppose "not notable" applies as well. Avriette 12:15, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. utcursch 13:33, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I know who she is (and Kevin and Liza etc), but she's not notable. If she had any other claim to fame... Radagast 17:03, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
- KEEP. I made several changes, and although I can't boost her notability, she's notable enough as a regular on Breakfast Television. —Mar·ka·ci:2005-02-28 19:24 Z
- Keep --Theo (Talk) 03:03, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.