Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Fimmel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Joyous 06:25, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Radiant! 15:42, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep (25k+ hits in Google), but under the condition that it is NPOVed. --Sn0wflake 18:17, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I'm not sure at what point a "celebrity" (love those scare quotes) becomes notable enough, but this guy does appear to have an acting job on WB. Perhaps if his new series becomes popular. Hmmm. For the time being a very weak keep. HyperZonk 19:19, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep it, someone might care enough to look it up sometime. Wyss 19:57, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. He's done someacting as well as modeling. RickK 20:56, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep starring roles in two different major-network TV series, and has an active fan community. Well above the bar. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 10:44, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Celebrity = notability.--Centauri 01:36, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, POV promo. Megan1967 06:35, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. The current article is fannish and vain-sounding which would have made it a deletion candidate at first blush, but the subject certainly exceeds the notability factor. Needs a POVectomy and expansion to be sure. - Lucky 6.9 01:15, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Norman Rogers\talk 01:18, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like vanity. JamesBurns 10:13, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.