Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Millones

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – Rich Farmbrough 23:16, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Raymond Millones

Delete as a teacher who is known mainly for humorous comments to his classes. Joyous 00:36, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Vanity. Postdlf 00:39, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Keep This man is a legend, soon he's gonna be in all encyclopedias in the world. 00:45, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)

- Above is the only other edit by the creator of the page, 65.93.69.91 (talk · contribs). --jpgordon ∇∆∇∆ 00:51, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Keep. Postdlf 00:39, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) Fraudulent entry by User:65.93.69.91. --jpgordon ∇∆∇∆ 00:51, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Just some teacher. --jpgordon ∇∆∇∆ 00:51, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep.Sorry I have to do this, but I don't know any other way of communicating to people reading this. How is this man so different from some dead person or some random low budget film star? He won a TDSB Teacher Excellence award for being a great business teacher.
- Another fraudulent entry by User:65.93.69.91. --Chill Pill Bill 02:06, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- No, addressing your concern here is fine, that is the very purpose of this discussion page, to discuss validity. Compared to low-budget film stars or dead famous people, there are no Google results, and he is known mainly for his joking... sorry, but, no, he is not notable. And here at Wikipedia we don't care how notable someone *might* possibly become given time, only about how notable they are right NOW. Please see Wikipedia is not a crystal ball for details. Master Thief Garrett 02:10, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Also, please sign your responses in a discussion so we can tell who said what. As it is, some users (such as Chill Pill Bill) have taken this as malicious/fraudulent commenting, and I do not necessarily blame them. EDIT: and don't think we can't tell from the history who *really* wrote what, because (as demonstrated) we can. Master Thief Garrett 02:10, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. non-notable, vanity, teachercruft. Master Thief Garrett 02:10, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable. Megan1967 05:28, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete, can think of a half-dozen Toronto educators with better credentials and funnier comments who still aren't notable enough to be on wikipedia. --Veritol 12:27, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete not notable Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:41, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Probably a homage from a well meaning student - but non-notable. TigerShark 13:46, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Speedy delete. Pavel Vozenilek 13:55, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Oh, NOW i get it.. You're all racists and hate black and hispanic people like this wonderful man. Damn, another blatant example of a hate crime in progress. It's all clear to me now, especially after searching for ANY black/hispanic teachers on Wikipedia, and finding none. By guyman that made dis fine retarded article. (unsigned, Millonesisgay)
- PLEASE sign your posts so we know who says what. You may not find any black/hispanic teachers on here, but you will NOT find many "whiteys" either. Teachers are, as a rule, not important enough.
- We are NOT racists, don't gimme that bull, that's the oldest trick in the book, someone non-white is to be dealt with by the law or whatnot and there are cries of "racism, racism!" in the background. Now understand this, if this article was about my own father I'd have it mercilessly culled! This man is NOT important enough to be here. Please understand this... and don't word your statement in an inciteful way, or people may take offence and bite back. Master Thief Garrett 22:55, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- We can assume that last anonymous posting was pure trollage. (Besides, even if it wasn't, how could we tell the subject of the article was anything other than albino? The article doesn't indicate anything about race, creed, color, shoe size, or blood type.) --jpgordon ∇∆∇∆ 00:28, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- The person who wrote the comment about racism can't possibly be serious. By that logic, all black and hispanic people would be inherently notable. — JIP | Talk 11:45, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. And please remember to not feed the trolls. Rossami (talk) 05:00, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete for potential defamation, lack of encyclopedic nature, etc.--TPB 03:36, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, possible spanking. -- 8^D ^gab 05:26, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)
Delete Nothing more really need be said. Binabik80 05:41, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.