Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fisher & Hansen

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 15:58, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Fisher & Hansen

This seems too suspicious to pass up. I believe it may be vanity because the major editor has a similar name to the title of this 'article'. -- Riffsyphon1024 21:26, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Delete. How can it be notable when "Fisher & Hansen was incorporated February 2005" (emphasis added) Zzyzx11 00:31, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, I also noticed that. It's still February right now. -- Riffsyphon1024 02:01, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete, notability not established, possible vanity. Megan1967 01:51, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.