Talk:Rosicrucian Monographs
Why it is a separate article
[edit]- The contents of this article were part of the Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis article. Soon I decided to turn Rosicrucian Monographs into a separate article because: 1) Today, the Rosicrucian Monographs are available from other Rosicrucian orders too, apart from AMORC. In accordance with the Wikipedia's NPOV policy, I preferred to discuss these documents outside the AMORC article. In the current article, Monographs of all Orders may fit under their sections. and 2) The AMORC article was very big (about 40KB) and I needed some way to reduce its size. Optim 17:03, 31 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Your comments
[edit]your comments here:
This article is out-of-date in the sections 1.4 and 1.5 and in the introduction which references the Illuminati section and the Ordo Summum Bonum. The Planes no longer exist, and the Illuminati section is never described in the Master of Life. I don't want to rock the boat, but I would like to re-write this article with up-to-date information. Is that OK with everyone?
-- Steven A Armstrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenaarmstrongsf (talk • contribs) 16:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
[edit]Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://rosicrucian.org/home-study-lessons. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:46, 15 March 2015 (UTC)