User talk:Ketiltrout
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 91 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 20 sections are present. |
As you have contributed to a related article, you might want to know about the AfD for FamilySearch. --
BLAST is not in the List_of_astronomy_acronyms
[edit]Now it is. Thanks, CarpD 14/12/06
Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) has smiled at you! Smiles are good! and hopefully this one has made your day better. Why not smile at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend? Happy editing!
New Page Patrol survey
[edit] New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Ketiltrout! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
June 2012
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
church disambiguation pages
[edit]Hi Ketiltrout, i notice a couple of edits on my watchlist where you have revised church disambiguation pages, including this edit to the First United Presbyterian Church page. Could I ask that you stop and discuss, before editing more? Because there are a few hundred of these, I think, and it is not obvious what is best formatting, but we don't want some editors going one way vs. others going another. On that page, I do agree that some editing was called for. I will edit there now, to what I think it should be, then can we discuss? sincerely, Doncram
"NH3" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect NH3 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 8#NH3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Dere
[edit]One of your changes at Dere was reverted because it was discussed and conforms to MOS. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
"DC Circuit" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect DC Circuit has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 4 § DC Circuit until a consensus is reached.
The article Clarke Glacier (Marie Byrd Land) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Antarctic stub not passing WP:GEONATURAL; only substantial source available is GNIS
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AviationFreak💬 19:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Invitation
[edit]
Hello Ketiltrout!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Number Two (The Prisoner) for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number Two (The Prisoner) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
QuicoleJR (talk) 12:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thank you for cleaning up so many partially disambiguated pages * Pppery * it has begun... 00:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC) |
Mumtaz move
[edit]Hello Ketiltrout, why did you move Mumtaz (actress) to Mumtaz (Indian actress)? Is there a plan to convert Mumtaz (actress) to a dab page? Jay 💬 21:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not a dab page, but the plan is to retarget it to Mumtaz with a {{R from incomplete disambiguation}} tag.—Ketil Trout (<><!) 22:37, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
List of Hindi films of 19xx LTA vandal
[edit]Hi! I see you came across this idiot at List of Hindi films of 1962. If you come across them again, just revert and slap a {{uw-vand4}} notice on their TP. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation/Archive 53#Lists of Indian films - a heads-up. They never hang around in one place long enough to go to WP:AIV, and whac-a-mole seems the only solution. Best, Narky Blert (talk) 00:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oh my! I must admit I didn't even notice the vandalism. I was just fixing links to the newly-moved Mumtaz (Indian actress). Good catch—Ketil Trout (<><!) 00:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Mizan
[edit]Why did you move Mizan page without opening a discussion? Please don't continue such moves, Egeymi (talk) 05:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
"Unuk" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Unuk has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20 § Unuk until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The article X Carinae has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence that it meets the notability guidelines for astronomical objects. 1. Not visible to the naked eye, 2. Not in any high-importance catalog, 3. Never received significant coverage in reliable sources and 4. Was not discovered in 1850. SIMBAD cites 41 references for this star, but all are just big catalogs and do not give any significant coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
"Tom (programming language)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Tom (programming language) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 5 § Tom (programming language) until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)