I think this is an excellent article and a very timely subject. Missi (22:37, May 16, 2005)
Object: not comprehensive is the most important thing, but it also needs references. Basically, the article should have an intro that gives a general summary (the basics: what you might find in a paper encyclopedia), followed by sections which deal with parts of his life in greater detail. It's not bad, though, I could see it being featured with some more work. Everyking08:42, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object: I agree with Everyking for the most part. The article could use topical subdivision: biographical info, medical achievements, political involvement. Something like that. —thames15:06, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Refer to peer review. There's no subsectioning or references. Mgm|(talk) 08:17, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
