User talk:larryv

Speedy Deletion of Northwest Minnesota Arts Council Page

Hello

I am realizing I erred when creating our Wikipedia page for Northwest Minnesota Arts Council, a 501(c)3 non-profit arts organization. I need to put the page under a sub category for "Arts Non-Profits in Minnesota", however, I do not see where I can do that.

Any help would be great appreciated.Moregalado (talk) 22:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Moregalado

@Moregalado: I'm not quite sure what you mean. The closest category I've found is Arts organizations based in Minnesota. You may want to read Wikipedia:FAQ/Categories and Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization to understand how categories relate to articles.

In any case, categories are very much secondary to the article content itself. If you recreate Northwest Minnesota Arts Council, you'll have to address the concerns I had when I deleted it—WP:A7 and WP:G11. You might find our Articles for Creation process useful. larryv (talk) 21:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Assault Craft Unit TWO page... citing copyright infringement

The ACU2 Page was deleted because GLOBALSECURITY.org claims copyright over the words used on the page. But clearly, globalsecurity.org took them from the Navy page, "http://www.public.navy.mil/surflant/acu2/Pages/History.aspx". I work at the command, and can state that the Navy does not retain any copyright over the words used on the page, but wants to put the history of the command and any topic concerning the command in the Wikipedia sphere to be in line with other like commands. I will be starting a New ACU 2 page to get the FACTs of ACU2 out there. I will be using "http://www.public.navy.mil/surflant/acu2/Pages/default.aspx" and all pages associated with it as my source, which I quote and link to on the page. I will be changing the words to not match exactly. I want to CONTEST that globalsecurity.org has any special right to the words taken from the Navy Page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Micah.weihert (talk • contribs) 14:51, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

@Micah.weihert: Sorry, I was unaware of the Navy website when I deleted the article. You're correct about the copyright status of U.S. federal government works, of course, but I'd recommend that you avoid quoting the site at all, to prevent possible future copyvio mixups. Simply present the information there in your own words and cite the site. larryv (talk) 20:07, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Oneplus1

An article that you just deleted Oneplus1 was just put back. I renominated for speedy deletion G11 and A7. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

@Jersey92: Oy. I'll take a look, thanks. larryv (talk) 03:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Deletions

I had objected to the deletions of

(Deletion log); 02:37 . . Larryv (talk | contribs) deleted page Category:Organizations based in France by subject ‎(C1: Empty category)
(Deletion log); 02:37 . . Larryv (talk | contribs) deleted page Category:Organisations based in the United Kingdom by membership ‎(C1: Empty category)

and had assumed that someone would reverse the out-of-process emptying rather than just ignore my efforts. I'd be grateful if you could at least restore these 2 cats + my objections. Oculi (talk) 08:22, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Moreover Category:Organisations based in the United Kingdom by membership is not empty as I repopulated it 2 days ago. It is also at cfd (untagged). Oculi (talk) 08:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

I'd be grateful if you could restore the 2 categories mentioned above. The deleting admin is supposed to check the talk page before deletion. Oculi (talk) 18:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

@Oculi: Sorry for the trouble; I've restored the categories and their talk pages. I've added {{popcat}} to Organizations based in France by subject to prevent someone else from nominating it for speedy deletion again. larryv (talk) 00:48, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks - it was again speedied so I've re-populated it. It remains at cfd untagged. Oculi (talk) 02:02, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Courtesy note about Draft:William Yang

Hi Larryv,
I have requested the undeletion of that draft article.
Not sure if that request put up one of those little red numerals with a bell icon after it, so doing it manually.
Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:23, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

@Shirt58: I see someone else got to it before me! (FYI, {{re}} is an easy way of notifying users.) larryv (talk) 00:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Restoring YottaSolutions

Hello Larryv, I would appreciate it if you can restore YottaSolutions article as a draft so I can work on it and modify it with specialists then submit it for reviewing if it's allowed or not yet. I can keep working until it's perfect for publishing. Thanks. Smith7700 (talk) 20:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

@Smith7700: No problem; I've restored it to Draft:YottaSolutions. When you're ready to submit it for review, just add {{subst:submit}} to the top. larryv (talk) 21:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

@Larryv: Can you please tell me what was the wrong with my article so I start working on it from there? I don't see any problem with it. Please guide me. Thanks. Smith7700 (talk) 21:12, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Pete Drungle

Thanks for the notice. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 20:54, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

need to restart work on BMGI page

Hi, I created this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BMGI#BMGI It got deleted due to inadequate references. Can I restart working on this page ? Please help. Sujay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sujaydeo (talk • contribs) 16:48, 1 February 2016‎

@Sujaydeo: I assume you mean Draft:Breakthrough Management Group International. Since that article went through a deletion discussion, I'm not really comfortable userfying it. I suggest that you request a deletion review instead. larryv (talk) 21:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Afrocandy

Hello, the page Afrocandy does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. She's clearly not notable in anyway whatsoever, have a look for yourself. The user Oshwah insists as if he has something personal to do with Afrocandy. I put a speedy deletion tag and it was removed by the user Oshwah many times and now he's saying something very strange that a person doesn't have to be proven notable to be on Wikipedia, please see his shocking comments on my talk page. None of what he has explained makes sense quite honestly. I'm bringing this to the attention of an admin because this page needs to be deleted. The sources quoted are blogs and she has made no impact on the Nigerian music industry, has won no awards and is not well known even in Nigeria. Do your own research please and see for yourself, all she has are small mentions. Please advise. Thanks PaulAshford (talk) 23:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Larryv. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Larryv.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Larryv. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Guaranteed Rate

Hi LarryV- Most of my recent article was deleted for 'Guaranteed Rate' and I'd like to recover it to compose a draft for review. Indeed, I am affiliated with the company and was tasked with updating the page with the most recent and accurate financial information. I was aware of the conflict of interest statutes and attempted to write unbiased copy, but apparently I failed! Anyway, would you mind posting my deleted article in my user space? I appreciate any help you can give me. Thank you!!! Klambert3232 (talk) 13:38, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Larryv. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Larryv. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:22, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject NYC transit

Hi Larryv,

I'm a student reporter with Uptown Radio--a live weekly show run out of Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. I've been doing mini-profiles of editors involved in wikiproject NYC/transit. I'm reaching out to see if you would get me in contact with editors who have been active in the NYC transportation wiki? I would really appreciate it. You can reach me here or at my email: jwm2164@columbia.edu. thx!--Sachiclendo (talk) 22:53, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Unfortunately I've fallen out of touch with the project since my editing heyday and am not familiar with its current state. I would recommend looking through editing histories (like this one) to get a sense of who's currently active, then contacting them directly. They're also likelier to know who else is active! (I do remember DanTD from my Wikipedia salad days and am glad to see he's still fighting the good fight.) larryv (talk) 03:25, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

It's a fight I'm losing, sadly. The recent efforts to screw up the naming conventions for stations has soured me on the entire project. But there are still images and info that I believe are necessary for many of the articles on Wikipedia. Plenty of other editors still work at WP:NYCT.---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:13, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Hey Larry! I'm still contributing with the WikiProject after an 8 year hiatus (I used to go by Imdanumber1, Ive dropped the username to go with something less arrogant). But hey, we would love to have you contribute with us again, we definitely need past editors to help out from time to time, especially with the naming convention battle we've been having...you can ask DanTD, he and I have been putting up a fight to keep things the way they are, and it is hectic. Doesn't help that past contributors like Marc Shepherd, Cecropia and Alphachimp aren't around anymore. :( —LRG5784 (talk · contribs · email) 12:52, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Beginner mistake on editing

Hello @Larryv,

I edited a page to update it, not knowing the rules concerning editing without drafting. Is it possible to make a draft from the 'AT Internet' page before the rollback please? That way i will be able to work on it with the community. I did them as an update (if you read the old version, it used to stop at 2016, and even before, on many aspects and was much more promotional for no reason for older products). I clearly seek to make a comprehensive, objective and sourced presentation of the company. My issue that no question had an answer in the talk page. If I got it well, once I have my draft, I must ask for submission to contributors, right? I don't know if this is part of your mission or not, but I would be glad to work on it with you if need be.

Cheers, --Bricegrenon (talk) 21:21, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Don't hesitate to get in touch for further information

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi - I'm a brand new wikipedia person. I was helping a non-profit I work for (Morris Animal Foundation) refresh our page but when I uploaded the new page (which was hours of work due to lots of citations) I got a message about a potential conflict of interest. I would seriously hate to lose this work but got a message it might be still out there and could be fixed - can you help? KdiehlMAF (talk) 21:26, 19 October 2020 (UTC)KdiehlMAF

Beginner mistake again...

Hi - I left the above message about the conflict of interest. Sorry I didn't have a heading - too bummed about 5 hours of work going down the drain. I'm hoping you can help. I forgot to ask if you'd be willing to proofread it or know someone who would. Thanks! KdiehlMAF (talk) 21:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Larry, KdiehlMAF appears to have come here because their welcome message contained a link to Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to provide copies of deleted articles from which they picked your name. Not to worry though: the article has not been deleted; the user's edits have merely been reverted. I've already contacted them (on my user talk page) to give them pointers, including a link to Help:Page history so they know how to retrieve the reverted text if needed. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:22, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Request for copy of deleted "Michael A. Aquino" article

Hi there!

I am hoping you might be able to provide me with a copy of the article on Michael A. Aquino. I have been working on a draft article on the subject that I hope will meet Wikipedia's standards, and if there is anything useful in the deleted article I hope I might be able to use it as a resource (not just citing the old article directly in the new one, to be clear!). I want to have a solid foundation of a draft article before I plead my case for undeletion :)

(FYI, just for context, I believe the article's original deletion was done at the request of the subject, Aquino, himself, likely due to unsourced or poorly-sourced claims which did not meet BLP requirements. Aquino has since died, and is no longer a "LP". I don't know how this affects things, necessarily, but seems to me worth mentioning)

Cheers, --De Insomniis (talk) 23:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

​I get your point about the subject being—uh, ex-LP—but I'm still a little reluctant to wade into a BLP-adjacent issue, especially since I don't currently have the time to do even a cursory look into the article's history and context. I suggest requesting the deleted content be restored to your user space, making it clear that you wish to use it as a reference and are not requesting that the article be undeleted. larryv (talk) 00:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

​I totally get your reluctance & respect your decision. Thank you for your prompt response, and thank you for suggesting what I should do next! This has been a great help :)

Cheers,

--De Insomniis (talk) 01:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LIRR-footer

Template:LIRR-footer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)