Talk:Ned Leeds

Comics: Marvel / Spider-Man Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Spider-Man work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Retcon

What does "retconned" mean? --Tagishsimon

Subsequent stories rewrote the information. In this case it was a limited series entitled "Hobgoblin Lives", about 8 years ago now. Timrollpickering 01:40, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Pictures

I propose we add some pictures of Ned Leeds, aswell as one with him as the Hobgoblin. What do you think? 70.58.221.220

Main suspect

Ned Leeds was the main suspect when the Green Goblin's identity was still a secret

Is there any evidence for this? It's been a while since I've read the stories but I can't recall much that really pushed Leeds as a suspect - the only suspect investigated (and cleared) was Frederick Foswell. It does, however, seem likely he was Ditko's choice (see the quote on Green Goblin) but I think someone may have over extrapolated the details on the Spidey Kicks Butt article at http://www.spideykicksbutt.com/SquanderedLegacy/SquanderedLegacyPart1.html Timrollpickering (talk) 00:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Out-universe editorial info on the Leeds-Kingsley controversy

As I understand it, Roger Stern originally wanted Roderick Kingsley to be the Hobgoblin, but it was later revealed to be Leeds, either because of editorial disagreement, or because Stern left the title for other reasons before the reveal could be written. I read the book Stern wrote several years ago in which he established that Kingsley was indeed Hobs, and not Leeds, and addressed some of the continuity issues and logic problems with the idea of Leeds being the villain, but none of this is currently mentioned in the article. It needs to be added, and with proper sources.

Also, the pic currently in the Infobox is indeed an important one, but since he was not really Hobgoblin, it should be moved further down in the article, and replaced with a more neutral one that shows him in normal attire.

Replacement for main article picture

As others have pointed out in this discussion page, it is misleading to have Ned Leeds' in the Hobgoblin attire as his main article photo, given that he was not the main Hobgoblin (Roderick Kingsley was). I propose we replace that picture with a different one that highlights his position as a Daily Bugle employee.

Quirky-artist-charlie (talk) 15:59, 12 December 2017 (PST)

I just wanted to acknowledge that the image was changed in July 2019. Thank you! Quirky-artist-charlie (talk) 05:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion nomination(s)

One or more images currently used in this article have been nominated for deletion as violations of the non-free content criteria (NFCC).

You can read more about what this means and why these files are being nominated for deletion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Image deletion nominations for NFCC 8 and 3a.

You can participate at the deletion discussion(s) at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 May 1. If you are not familiar with NFCC-related deletion discussions, I recommend reading the post linked above first.

Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:25, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MCU movies

Why is the listing for No Way Home a synopsys of the entire movie instead of focus on the Ned character? 24.32.230.242 (talk) 14:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]