Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katha Upanishad

Looks like text of document. There is no analysis or history or any such thing that would suggest a encyclopedic entry. wikisource here we come! -Vina 16:49, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Delete: Not wikisource, as it's some variant upanishad. Otherwise, it's a sermon/original research. Geogre 18:53, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
It's a copyvio. On Wikipedia:copyright problems Dunc_Harris|☺ 19:02, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
I don't believe this is a case of copyvio, since no one can claim copyright of a text dating from c.1500-800 B.C. I also don't believe it's a variant. The Upanishads belonging to the Rig Veda include: the Aitareya, and the Kaushitaki. The Upanishads belonging to the Sama Veda include: the Chandogya, and the Kena. The Upanishads belonging to the Yajur Veda include: the Brihadaranyaka, the Isha, the Taittiriya, the Shvetashvatara, and the Katha. The Upanishads belonging to the Atharva Veda include: the Mundaka, the Mandukya, and the Prasna. But I do agree this text should be moved to Wikisource. Afsi 21:51, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]