Talk:Wright brothers

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wright brothers article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 365 days

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Wright brothers. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Wright brothers at the Reference desk.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Wright brothers was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 17, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
March 11, 2024	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 17, 2004, December 17, 2005, December 17, 2006, December 17, 2007, December 17, 2008, December 17, 2009, December 17, 2015, and December 17, 2019.

Current status: Delisted good article

Aviation: Biography

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aerospace biography project.

Biography: Science and Academia / Core

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is listed on the project's core biographies page.

Christianity: Anabaptist Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Anabaptist work group (assessed as Low-importance).

History of Science High‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Invention Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWikipedia:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics: Fluid Dynamics / Biographies Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

United States: Indiana / North Carolina / Ohio High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as High-importance).
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as High-importance).
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as High-importance).

The Importance of Kites

Years ago, I read a Scientific American article about the Wright Brothers. (Probably in the 80s or 90s.) According to the article, the main purpose of the kits was to solve safety problems. They discovered the conditions that would cause wings to stall, and figured out how to prevent or recover from this, with their kites. Their commitment to safety came out of their decision to fly the planes themselves. So their decision to work out safety issues with unmanned kites before they ever built a full size plane was central to their success. But this article doesn't make that point It only mentions kites as a means of studying controls. (If I get a more accurate date for the article, I'll post it here.) — MiguelMunoz (talk) 02:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The two viewpoints are not mutually exclusive. Control and safety end up being the same thing in terms of results. If you can't control a plane it is unsafe. I'm not against someone adding more about safety, though. Binksternet (talk) 03:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be interested in seeing that article or a verifiable summary. My understanding from Wright biographies and Smithsonian articles is that the 1899 kite was intended to test control (wing warping in particular); I'm not aware that the brothers had much if any concept about "stall" at that early stage. Binksternet makes a good point that safety and control are closely linked. DonFB (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Wrights certainly had some concept of stalling, as is evident from Wilbur Wright's address to the Western Society of Engineers in 1901 [1] Consider this description of a Lilienthal glider mishap:

In one glide the machine rose higher and higher till it lost all headway. This was the position from which Lilienthal had always found difficulty to extricate himself, as his machine then, in spite of his greatest exertions, manifested a tendency to dive downward almost vertically and strike the ground head on with frightful velocity. Wilbur goes on to describe in some detail what he saw as the cause of this phenomenon (movement of the centre of pressure with changes in angle of attack, to use modern terminology - see also the numbered summary statements at the end of the address).

As for the purpose of kite experiments, Wilbur explicitly states in the same address that manned kites were seen as a means of gaining experience:

We figured that Lilienthal in five years of time had spent only about five hours in actual gliding through the air. The wonder was not that he had done so little, but that he had accomplished so much. It would not be considered at all safe for a bicycle rider to attempt to ride through a crowded city street after only five hours' practice, spread out;in bits of ten seconds each over a period of five years; yet Lilienthal with this brief practice was remarkably successful in meeting the fluctuations and eddies of wind gusts. We thought that if some method could be found by which it would be possible to practice by the hour instead of by the second there would be hope of advancing the solution of a very difficult problem. It seemed feasible to do this by building a machine which would be sustained at a speed of 18 miles per hour, and then finding a locality where winds of this velocity were common. With these conditions, a rope attached to the machine to keep it from floating backward would answer very nearly the same purpose as a propeller driven by a motor, and it would be possible to practice by the hour, and without any serious danger, as it would not be necessary to rise far from the ground, and the machine would not have any forward motion at all.

Note however that Wilbur begins his address by describing how earlier unmanned kite experiments had demonstrated that certain assumptions regarding lift generated made by previous experimenters were incorrect, and that further experimentation was needed in order to determine the optimum aerofoil profile, wing planform etc - which eventually led to the Wright's building their wind tunnel. I'm not sure it is particularly useful to assert definitively what the purpose of the Wright kite experiments was - they saw achieving successful powered flight as something to be achieved through practical experimentation, and the kites were a part of this ongoing process. AndyTheGrump (talk) 08:13, 19 March 2023 (UTC).[reply]

There might be some confusion here over terminology. MiguelMunoz may be referring not simply to the 1899 kite, but to the subsequent gliders, which the brothers did fly unmanned as big kites before climbing in and piloting them. But the 1899 kite, which was truly the size of a kite, was not, I believe, intended to investigate much about lift and stall, but only to see if wing warping could be a workable method of lateral control. DonFB (talk) 10:41, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Without Katherine's German skills

there would be no flight for these two. Their sister was the key element for them to understand any of the German engineering and physics they were trying to implement, and the article appears to near-intentionally omit her presence vis-a-vis importance in the factual progress.

Happy to have the promise rings her brothers bestowed upon her, to be left out though. Arcsoda (talk) 21:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We have a full biography of Katharine Wright Haskell, and she is discussed quite a bit in this article. If you have a source which suggests that her knowledge of German played a significant part in the events described, cite it, and we can consider adding it, both here, and to her biography. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thx 47.44.177.230 (talk) 20:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Wright brothers

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This 2007 promotion contains significant uncited material, including 24 completely unsourced paragraphs; this means the article does not meet GA criterion 2b).

At over 12,000 words of prose (not counting lengthy quotes or captions), this article might also contain "excessive detail" and breach criterion 3b); considering the important subject matter, this is up for discussion. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Heavier-than-air?

The lead paragraph describes the brothers as having flown a "heavier-than-air aircraft" but this is meaningless and removing the adjective should be considered. All flying creatures and objects are heavier than air, so it is tautological to say so. It make the encyclopaedia look illiterate. Spideog (talk) 17:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hot air balloons are lighter-than-air aircraft, and have been used for human flights sinvce 1783. The Wright brothers did not create the first aircraft. Dimadick (talk) 21:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Try lifting a hot air balloon. Much heavier than air. Spideog (talk) 18:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hot air lifts hot air balloons by making them lighter than surrounding cooler air. —RCraig09 (talk) 19:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So is a hot air balloon lighter than air or heavier? The article says heavier but you say lighter. Spideog (talk) 19:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article does not say hot air balloons are heavier than air. They are lighter than air. —RCraig09 (talk) 19:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What a load of pedantic nonsense. Obviously the balloon itself is denser than air. When filled with air hotter than the surrounding atmosphere the whole may be less dense. In any case, @Lighter than air' is the generally accepted term for aerostats.TheLongTone (talk) 13:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who's claiming the Wright brothers created the first aircraft? DeerManGoat (talk) 16:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody. They built the first powered heavier-than air aircraft capable of controlled flight and of taking off under its own power. Unless,, of course, you are Brazilian.TheLongTone (talk) 12:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 June 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I would like to add to the external links section. I want to add a hyperlink to http://www.oldmagazinearticles.com/article-summary/wilbur_wright_obituary with the label Wilbur Wright Obituary from Collier's Magazine, 1912. Sonny.lucas (talk) 23:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, we aren't going to help you promote the website you have been spamming into multiple articles. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]