Talk:Biopolymer

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PolymersWikipedia:WikiProject PolymersTemplate:WikiProject PolymersPolymers articles

Molecular Biology: Genetics / MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Biopolymer was copied or moved into Life sciences with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Copy edit

I think this article needs some copy editing Tamicus (talk) 13:25, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notes on the editing of this page

This page is all messed up. I started to fix it into what I thought would be a more coherent form however now I myself am questioning wither or not Polynucleotide polymers are indeed Biopolymers. They are indeed in all living organisms but that has no bearing that they are created by living organisms. I changed the header and grouped biopolymers into their three categories. These can be expounded upon a bit. Was thinking about changing the nomenclature section to examples of each of the three categories. Would not human made polymers be biopolymers? Now the question becomes is there a significant difference between polymers and biopolymers.

Copyright problem

This article has been reverted to an earlier version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Text entered in [1] duplicated at least in part material from [2]. Other content added by this contributor has been copied from other sources. For instance, in this edit, content was copied from Herman Francis Mark Encyclopedia of polymer science and engineering (1985). Although only snippet views of the book are available, we can verify verbatim copying of the following: "If left in place, however, conventional films can cause problems during harvesting or during cultivating operations the next year. Removal and disposal", [3]. "are costly and inconvenient. Therefore, interest in the development of biodegradable or photodegradable films with short service lifetimes has grown. Although a large number of polymer types could be designed for controlled degradation, only a few have been commercialized." [4]. Given the need for the contributor copyright investigation, other content added by this contributor has been presumptively removed in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. Content added by other contributors subsequent to the introduction of this material can be restored if it does not merge with this text to create a derivative work. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. ----Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 22:54, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proteins

Surely proteins are also biopolymers. But the current article does not say so. Am I misunderstanding something? --Ettrig (talk) 08:05, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Biopolymer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081023075853/http://biopol.free.fr/ to http://biopol.free.fr/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are biopolymers biodegradable period? Or only some of them are?

"Biopolymers are biodegradable, and some are also compostable. Some biopolymers are biodegradable..."

Which is it? The text can't say both and having the repetition in the sentence is bad form either way.