Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Main Page (article)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE, which has already been done. Mgm|(talk) 09:22, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
Uttterly non-notable. It's about Wikipedia's main page! Eric119 06:34, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- This is surely covered in the Wikipedia namespace for anyone who's interested. I suggest a delete. - RedWordSmith 07:07, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete —Mar·ka·ci 07:23, 2005 Jan 30 (UTC)
- Delete self-reference. Though it made me laugh, which is a plus. —Korath (Talk) 10:00, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, heh, that was funny. Inter 13:23, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- BJAODN and Delete self reference. Hey, if it's so funny, maybe it belongs in BJAODN. --Deathphoenix 14:58, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Neutral This is my second failed page. Please excuse me for being a noob. I'll let you guys decide on this. User:DoubleRing
- Delete I'm neutral on the issue of BJAODN though. Thryduulf 20:48, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Neutral, but DoubleRing had the right idea; if somebody wanted to add a "Main Page" section to our article on Wikipedia, it would be welcome, summarizing all the various features etc. Meelar (talk) 06:50, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
- I was half-tempted to suggest something similar. - RedWordSmith 07:02, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete ÅrУnT†∈ 09:09, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.