Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wars Conclusion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 11:50, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
- Not encyclopedic and isn't linked to. Content is a bare minimum, I would think it would be more appropriate merged in to Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, which it already is in a way. --sitharus 01:09, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. There is already an article for Episode III. --NoPetrol 01:24, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Weird, rambling, non-encyclopedia. Binadot 01:56, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing worth merging with the EP.III article. 23skidoo 04:31, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, Nothing worth merging either. K1Bond007 06:32, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, if anyone can see anything worth merging with Episode 3 then that should be done, but I don't think any of it is salvagable. Rje 18:16, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
- If it's the same as Episode III, redirect there even if nothing is merged. Kappa 19:26, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete So many reasons that I lost count. Lack of a neutral POV for one thing. --Woohookitty 21:08, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. If only we could delete the movie as well. --Zarquon 04:13, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as rambling, near-nonsensical fan worship with no salvageable content. 1970? Try '77, bubbie. One too many hits of the ol' Mos Eisley bong will do that to ya. - Lucky 6.9 17:48, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.