Jump to content

Talk:Natalie Portman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNatalie Portman has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 8, 2006Good article nomineeListed
January 23, 2016Good article reassessmentDelisted
September 29, 2022Good article nomineeListed
October 28, 2022Peer reviewNot reviewed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 12, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Natalie Portman was a co-author on a scientific paper about frontal lobe activation?
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 9, 2021.
Current status: Good article


Corrected place of birth to correct - Jerusalem, Israel

[edit]

In accordance with Talk:Natalie Portman/Jerusalem and Israel enough time has passed to obviously reconsider the subject of this dispute. No one in their right mind will deny that Jerusalem is currently in Israel, regardless of your political views. The previous decision was clearly biased. However, Wikipedia and its community should not be politically biased. Jerusalem is in Israel and Natalie Portman was obviously born in Jerusalem as a city in Israel. This is what is stated in her ID documents. I propose to write in her and other people's place of birth Jerusalem, Israel, after many years there are enough reasons to accept this decision. Darislaw (talk) 20:34, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly that debate came to an end 18 years ago and the present status quo has persisted without issue since then. The Infobox and lead say she was born in Jerusalem, with no country qualifier, and that's fine. Everyone knows where Jerusalem is and it's fine as is whether you support the Israeli version, the Palestinian version or any other version of the complex claims to that city. As such, there is zero reason to upset the apple cart and make the change you suggest, and I would oppose it.  — Amakuru (talk) 21:17, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is obvious that the rules and foundations of the Wikipedia community have changed over the past 18 years. The community should not adapt to political views, but should be objective and create Wikipedia based on factual information. Darislaw (talk) 22:02, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you desire to be current, look to the Jerusalem article for guidance as to how en.wiki considers this topic.--☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 23:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]