Talk:Cosmo's Cosmic Adventure

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Only ten levels

In a part of the article, it said each episode had "10 or 11" levels, but no, each one only have 10 levels, and the final scene of episode 1 does not count, it's only an epilogue. 200.71.186.240 00:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duke Nuk?m

Should we call him Duke Nukem or Duke Nukum?

At the time when Cosmo was made, he was called Nukum. But now everybody knows him as Nukem. Calvero2 15:10, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The original, real, and final name is Duke Nukem. It was called Nukum for a time (but originally it was still Nukem), but I don't think that matters much. I think the real character and game name should be used, Nukem. The commentary and reference there are enough.Sega381 15:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced?

I'm not sure why this article is marked as unreferenced. What reference does it need (as of now, considering the information it has) but the game itself? I thought that non-verifiable things needed referecing, not easily verifiable ones. And if there is something that needs a reference, it should be marked as such. Otherwise, I think the tag should be removed.Sega381 20:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cosmo.gif

Image:Cosmo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:24, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sega381 17:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]