Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algiers Agreement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:35, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
A copy of the agreement is not encyclopedic. Maybe it could live on WikiSource or another Wikimedia project? In any case, this article should be deleted unless someone wants to re-write it. David Johnson [T|C] 20:18, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Agreed. Belongs at Wikisource. Though I must say keep, but re-written as a good stub.-Casito⇝Talk 22:39, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I am working on a re-write. Please give me a couple of days on this. Ground Zero 23:08, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep pending Ground Zero's rewrite. Important agreement that ended the Eritrean War. Capitalistroadster 05:47, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I have placed the text on wikisource here.
Assuming that a rewrite appears, Keep Dsmdgold 13:07, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC) - I've taken the first run at a re-write. Others are invited to improve on my work.
It is odd that we have an article about the agreement to end a war for which we have no article, but that is a part of Wikipedia's idiosyncratic charm. Let's hope there is an article on the war some day.See also Ethiopia-Eritrea War Ground Zero 16:33, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) - Now that Ground Zero has rewritten it, Keep. A useful contribution to a subject Wikipedia is weak in. -- llywrch 20:08, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Re-written, so keep. Ditto to Llywrch's comment. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:35, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.