Talk:Casavant Frères

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Quebec / History / Music / The 10,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

Classical music: Compositions

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Pipe organ (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pipe organ, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Pipe organWikipedia:WikiProject Pipe organTemplate:WikiProject Pipe organPipe organ articles

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Request

It would be nice for a knowledgeable person to create an article on tracker organs. This article mentions them with no definition. The current tracker article concerns music software, but has a link to a disambiguation page with a single sentence definition of tracker organs. --Blainster 05:02, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Added a link to Tracker action article on 2008-04-22 – Dhadams (talk) 16:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article Cleanup

The last section of this article is just a massive wall of text. A few images and paragraph breaks/formatting would do this article a service. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.158.119.137 (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I assume that you refer to the "Some Significant Casavant Organs" section, in which the significance of the organs listed has not been treated. Each should have its own referenced paragraph to describe its significance, beginning with uniform identification, say <opus>,<year>,<location>. Dhadams (talk) 00:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not in reference to this section, but to a section that I removed - see the red text in this link, which clearly exceeded the recordings category. [1] Rohrwerk (talk) 03:59, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't understand why recordings list not appropriate - they document the builder's work in sound. Section on recordings could indeed be improved and annotated, but removing it simply because the subject is not a recording artist is not appropriate. [2] Rohrwerk (talk) 04:15, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011 - Per the suggestion above, I'm completing work to supply Opus numbers and dates for all the instruments currently on the "Signficant organs" list. I've also provided links to specifications and other information where I could find something. I did not purposefully delete any information or entries. I agree that this list still needs documention as to why the instruments are "significant" while others not on the list are not. I especially note that except for one listing for Mexico, there are no entries for any organs outside the US/Canada. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.55.104 (talk) 19:07, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011 - Completed the work described above, supplying as much information as I could find and also reodrering the list by Opus number. I can't find any information on the last intrument on the list other than a reference to their Casavant on the church's website. Suggest removal from the list unless someone can provide a reason for it's inclusion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.55.104 (talk) 19:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Extended article on Gould recording inappropriate

The contribution of a long, poorly written paragraph on the Casavant organ used in the Glenn Gould recording of the Art of Fugue is out of place in a listing of recordings. Additional irrelevant information on details of the building's construction and the fire also strays far off the article topic. It does not even give proper bibliographic data for the recording in question! It should be completely deleted. Rohrwerk (talk) 16:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed off-topic information and added current recording reference Rohrwerk (talk) 17:49, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Casavant Frères. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Casavant Frères. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080514135539/http://www.dia.org/dft/ to http://www.dia.org/dft/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111008210513/http://www.municipalorgans.net/Records/Casavant/detroit.pdf to http://www.municipalorgans.net/Records/Casavant/detroit.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724230907/http://www.stjamesunitedchurchmontreal.com/organ.php to http://www.stjamesunitedchurchmontreal.com/organ.php
Corrected formatting/usage for http://sota.colostate.edu/facilities/music.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.stpeterscathedral.org/music.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Casavant Frères. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]