Talk:Hoosiers (film)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Untitled
[edit]A question here for Dale Arnett. Where did you get your information that, in the film Hoosiers, Hickory defeated an all-black team. I am very curious about this, having just completed Oscar Robertson's recent autobiography where he states the same thing.
In fact, if you watch the movie's championship game, there were two white starters for the opposing team from South Bend. It's even more noticeable when you see that two of the most fatal mistakes made by the South Bend team is by the white point guard. First, he shoots a long range jumper when South Bend just needs to hold onto the ball (no shot clock in 1952). Later, he allows himself to get trapped and throws the ball away setting up Hickory's final heroics. There are discrepancies in the movie, but playing an all-black team is not one of them. -- ho0sier
It is someone else, not Dale Arnett, who put that information. I corrected it so it would say South Bend Central was a predominantly black team (not all-black) and made the stuff about racial stereotypes more NPOV. --Tubutler 23:47, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
Cleanup - Rewrite
[edit]A picky point about the above: there are no "discrepancies" in the movie as to how it relates to Milan. The movie wasn't telling the story of the Milan Indians--just borrowed from it. It is one of those masterpieces of inspired casting, chemistry, and story-telling--like all movies inspired by something from life, it's fun to spot differences, but it's not even a "docu-drama." Buckboard--131.238.92.62 08:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- I completely agree with this. This movie was very loosely based on the Milan team, but the entire article is about the differences between the two. I feel it needs a complete rewrite. Jauerback 11:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- I agree that it needs a rewrite. Whoever wrote this seems to have an ax to grind. The movie Hoosiers is a work of fiction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.229.172.185 (talk) 20:19, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, it's a work of fiction, but given the number of fans of this movie that think it's an accurate retelling of the 1954 Milan Indians, a discussion of the differences might still be appropriate.Joe Garrick 14:19, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
different importance
[edit]please make first rows with diffeent links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoosier
Hoosiers is a music groupe too
regards abonino —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.60.51.191 (talk) 07:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I am astounded by how little information there is here. There isn't even a recap of the plot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.86.72.154 (talk) 03:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
historical errors?
[edit]I recall that in the early sixties, the hoop was still at the edge of the court rather than sticking out into the court as seen in the movie (due to its using a modern court unmodified). I also wonder if the lanes were painted differently from the rest of the court at that stadium in the fifties. Finally, while the free-throw style used is what I was taught in the late fifties, I question whether high-school students were using outside jump shots in the early fifties.Kdammers (talk) 07:45, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- The answers to these questions (and the inaccuracy of the stated recollection) can be seen here, a Youtube of the actual Milan/Muncie Central game from 1954. Outside jump shots, too.--Reedmalloy (talk) 12:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above linked YouTube video is removed, but you can see the game this link. BuckeyeSmithie (talk) 16:19, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
UK Band [in the first sentence] is ambiguous.
[edit]In the first sentence, describing this and other varieties of Hoosiers, a reference is made to a UK band named The Hoosiers. Coming as it does just after a reference to the University of Indiana, my first reading of UK seemed to imply University of Kentucky, rather than the United Kingdom.
I suggest changing 'UK band' to "British pop/rock band', as The Hoosiers are described in the linked page.
[I'm not well-versed in how to directly edit a page, hence my suggestion on the Talk page. Thanks]
Jim Carson Keller, TX — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.74.34.59 (talk) 13:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hoosiers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091207100732/http://www.loc.gov/film/nfr2001.html to http://www.loc.gov/film/nfr2001.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091207100732/http://www.loc.gov/film/nfr2001.html to http://www.loc.gov/film/nfr2001.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hoosiers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091122102933/http://connect.afi.com/site/DocServer/cheers100.pdf?docID=202 to http://connect.afi.com/site/DocServer/cheers100.pdf?docID=202
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class American cinema articles
- Low-importance American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- C-Class Indiana articles
- Low-importance Indiana articles
- WikiProject Indiana articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Library of Congress articles
- Low-importance Library of Congress articles
- WikiProject Library of Congress articles
- C-Class film articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class Basketball articles
- WikiProject Basketball articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press