Talk:25 Martin Place

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Sydney Mid‑importance

	Australia portal 25 Martin Place is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Image

an image would be nice. Kingturtle 03:44, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Tallest from 1977-1992

OK, so what is the tallest building in Sydney now? Darcyj 23:05, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To roof: World Tower (230.1 m)

To spire: Chifley Tower (244.1 m)

The MLC is 2nd tallest to roof, but only 5th tallest to spire (actually the same figure, (228 m), because it doesn't have one). We need to pick a consistent figure in all Australian skyscraper articles.

- ҉ Randwicked ҉ 00:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit confused why the height of the building has been readjusted again to contradict the data from the official website of the MLC Centre itself! The official website at [1] says the structure is 244 metres (800 feet) high. The Emporis website that has been cited to support the contrary height of 228 metres [2] belongs to a 3rd party company in Germany, who happen to have got the number of floors incorrect (they state 60, it is actually 67). If the official MLC Centre website data is erroneous, surely contradictory information should be cited from a more reliable source.. for example, the architects, or a structural engineer from a Sydney based government body, university, or firm. Bezapt 01:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emporis is the most authoritative web source, they're recognised as the official database of the Council for Tall Buildings which is the (self-appointed) body that crowns 'world's tallest' buildings. Their database is updated by people who work in construction and in local government. The 244 m figure is according to multiple sources both the height above sea level (not relevant here) and the height from street to the top of the antenna. Antennas aren't counted in building heights by the Council of Tall Buildings. The property managers will of course pick the tallest number to make their building sound impressive, that doesn't make it the official figure. And you will notice that Emporis says there are 60 floors OG, meaning over or above ground. There are presumably 67 floors if you count the basement levels. Again, the owners are picking the more impressive figure. - ҉ Randwicked ҉ 02:02, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, it's apparently just a coincidence that the building's roof height above sea level [3] is the same as the antenna height above the street [4], and not someone confusing the figures. Who knows which figure the official website is treating as the real height? You can see why this always leads to arguments. - ҉ Randwicked ҉ 02:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

Shouldn't this article include the criticism for ruining the streetscape of Martin Place? I've heard that many architects hate this building because it's set so far back and interrupts the line created by the surrounding buildings. Anyone who has visited the building would be likely to notice this quite easily. (Huey45 (talk) 10:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MLC Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]