Talk:Transcription

See also Talk:Transliteration. -- dnjansen

There is very little reason to move this page since What links to Transcription is overwhelming about the biological term. --mav

Clarity and simplicity

For beginners the page has neither - perhaps a basic overview of what transcription is and how it works would be beneficial. - ben

I am refering to the genetic transcription page.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.248.82.158 (talk) 15:02, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Linguistiques Imane zaynab (talk) 17:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Small definition and "written copy"

I believe it is appropriate to use the term 'written,' despite non-phonetic uses such as genetic and technological. This is because both of those mediums metaphorically refer to writing (the DNA code involves lettering; data is written to disk). Again, I urge that the use of "Item W may refer to XYZ" be discontinued where possible, as it is essentially meaningless and there are usually much better replacements involving brief definitions – which are not prohibited (refer WP:DABSTYLE, "Start each list with a short introductory sentence fragment" and the linked MOS page, MOS:DAB.

Specifically, due to historical precedent I believe "Transcription (linguistics)" to be in some ways the most prominent (or in a way, "sub-primary" topic) as it has been around the longest; therefore MOS:DABPRIMARY applies over MOS:DABINT for generic introductory lines. Techhead7890 (talk) 11:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC) (PS: I think that's enough ruleslawyering for now!)[reply]

ترجمه

فوتشوب 37.239.167.23 (talk) 04:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]